Re: unicode Digest V12 #108

From: Leo Broukhis <leob_at_mailcom.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2011 01:07:48 -0700

2011/7/3 André Szabolcs Szelp <a.sz.szelp_at_gmail.com>:
>
> I would also think that ZWNJ is more safe and appropriate than CGJ.
> Szabolcs

How would it help? If I don't like typographic ligatures in principle,
I would be within my right to put ZWNJs between every pair of letters
and it must have absolutely no effect on recognizing digraphs for
collation.

Leo
Received on Sun Jul 03 2011 - 03:09:51 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 03 2011 - 03:09:51 CDT