On Tuesday 23 April 2013, Philippe Verdy <verdy_p_at_wanadoo.fr> wrote:
> There's also noather issue: your proposal now uses identifiers that will be resolved in a registry database you are the only one to control.
Not at all. The registry would be controlled by an International Standards Organization committee.
As you have raised the matter, here is a quote from a document that I submitted to the ISO/IEC 10646 committee in January 2012.
quote
My current thinking is that an ISO committee entity would choose sentences and symbols and then approach the ISO/IEC 10646 committee on an inter-committee liaison basis to ask for character code points to be assigned to the symbol and sentence pairs. For the avoidance of doubt I have, as at the time of preparing this document, made no application to ISO about such a committee entity carrying out such activities.
My thinking is that that ISO committee entity could potentially be one of the following.
1. A new ISO committee, generated for the purpose.
2. The ISO/IEC 10646 committee, or a subcommittee of the ISO/IEC 10646 committee.
3. An existing ISO committee, other than the ISO 10646 committee, or a subcommittee of that committee.
end quote
William Overington
23 April 2013
Received on Tue Apr 23 2013 - 04:57:22 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Apr 23 2013 - 04:57:23 CDT