Re: Encoding/Use of pontial unpaired UTF-16 surrogate pair specifiers

J Decker schreef op 2016-01-31 03:28:
> I've reconsidered and think for ease of implementation to just mask
> every UTF-16 character (not codepoint) with a 10 bit value, This will
> result in no character changing from BMP space to surrogate-pair or
> vice-versa.
>
> Thanks for the feedback.

So you are still trying to handle the unarmed output as plaintext.
Do you realize that if a string in the output is replaced by a canonical
equivalent
one this may mess up things because the originals are not canonical
equivalent?
Received on Sun Jan 31 2016 - 10:33:01 CST