Re: Encoding/Use of pontial unpaired UTF-16 surrogate pair specifiers

On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Chris Jacobs <chris.jacobs_at_xs4all.nl> wrote:
>
>
> J Decker schreef op 2016-01-31 03:28:
>>
>> I've reconsidered and think for ease of implementation to just mask
>> every UTF-16 character (not codepoint) with a 10 bit value, This will
>> result in no character changing from BMP space to surrogate-pair or
>> vice-versa.
>>
>> Thanks for the feedback.
>
>
> So you are still trying to handle the unarmed output as plaintext.
> Do you realize that if a string in the output is replaced by a canonical
> equivalent
> one this may mess up things because the originals are not canonical
> equivalent?
>
I see ... things like mentioned here
http://websec.github.io/unicode-security-guide/character-transformations/
Received on Sun Jan 31 2016 - 11:57:21 CST