Re: Proposal to add standardized variation sequences for chess notation

From: Markus Scherer <markus.icu_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 10:51:15 -0700

It seems to me that higher-level layout (e.g, HTML+CSS) is appropriate for
the board layout (e.g., via a table), board frame style, and cell/field
shading.
In each field, the existing characters should suffice.

markus
Received on Mon Apr 03 2017 - 12:52:02 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: William_J_G Overington: "Tags and custom vector glyph emoji (from Re: Tailoring the Marketplace (is: Re: Unicode Emoji 5.0 characters now final))"
Previous message: Asmus Freytag: "Re: Combining Class of Thai Nonspacing_Marks"
In reply to: Asmus Freytag: "Re: Proposal to add standardized variation sequences for chess notation"
Next in thread: Kent Karlsson: "Re: Proposal to add standardized variation sequences for chess notation"
Reply: Kent Karlsson: "Re: Proposal to add standardized variation sequences for chess notation"
Reply: Michael Everson: "Re: Proposal to add standardized variation sequences for chess notation"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Apr 03 2017 - 12:52:03 CDT