Re: Why so much emoji nonsense?

From: Pierpaolo Bernardi via Unicode <unicode_at_unicode.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 05:58:31 +0100

On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 4:26 AM, James Kass via Unicode
<unicode_at_unicode.org> wrote:

> The best time to argue against the addition of emoji to Unicode would be
> 2007 or 2008, but you'd be wasting your time travel. Trust me.

But it's always a good time to argue against the addition of more
nonsense to what we already have got.
Received on Thu Feb 15 2018 - 22:59:04 CST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Doug Ewell via Unicode: "+1 (was: Re: Why so much emoji nonsense?)"
Previous message: James Kass via Unicode: "Re: Why so much emoji nonsense?"
In reply to: James Kass via Unicode: "Re: Why so much emoji nonsense?"
Next in thread: Anshuman Pandey via Unicode: "End of discussion, please — Re: Why so much emoji nonsense?"
Reply: Anshuman Pandey via Unicode: "End of discussion, please — Re: Why so much emoji nonsense?"
Reply: James Kass via Unicode: "Re: Why so much emoji nonsense?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Feb 15 2018 - 22:59:04 CST