+1 (was: Re: Why so much emoji nonsense?)

From: Doug Ewell via Unicode <unicode_at_unicode.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 22:24:58 -0700

Philippe Verdy wrote:

> If people don't know how to read and cannot reuse the content and
> transmit it, they become just consumers and in fact less and less
> productors or creators of contents. Just look at opinions under
> videos, most of them are just "thumbs up", "like", "+1", barely
> counted only, unqualifiable (there's not even a thumb down).

+1 is actually a convenient shorthand when all that needs to be said is
"I agree" or "me too" (especially now that the latter has taken on a
highly charged meaning in the U.S.). It is especially popular in the
IETF. It is not intended for situations that require explanation or
details.

--
Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org 
Received on Thu Feb 15 2018 - 23:25:21 CST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Feb 15 2018 - 23:25:21 CST