Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?

From: Philippe Verdy via Unicode <unicode_at_unicode.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 05:31:10 +0100

Sorry, but such English subtle interpretations are not in my mind, don't
suppose everyone uses the second degree everytime something is posted here,
these are just unneeded diversions causing trouble, it does not make the
thread clear to follow.

2018-02-21 5:15 GMT+01:00 James Kass <jameskasskrv_at_gmail.com>:

> Philippe, it was a jest. (Good one, too!)
>
Received on Tue Feb 20 2018 - 22:31:58 CST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Phake Nick via Unicode: "Re: IDC's versus Egyptian format controls"
Previous message: James Kass via Unicode: "Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?"
In reply to: James Kass via Unicode: "Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?"
Next in thread: Robert Wheelock via Unicode: "Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?"
Reply: Robert Wheelock via Unicode: "Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?"
Reply: Khaled Hosny via Unicode: "Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Feb 20 2018 - 22:31:58 CST