Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?

From: Robert Wheelock via Unicode <unicode_at_unicode.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 01:10:29 -0500

The whole *ASCII apostrophe* thing for Qazaqi (Kazakh) could be avoided by
using a Turkish-based orthography; this way, /h/ can still be distinguished
from /x/, /u/ from /w/, ... !

·<Ä Ö Ü> for front rounded vowels /æ ø y/
·<Ş J> for laminal fricatives /ʃ ʒ/, and <Ç C> for laminal affricates /tʃ
dʒ/
·<X> for /x ~ ꭓ/, and <Ğ> for its voiced counterpart /ɣ ~ ʁ/
·The Turkish dull-I letter <İ ı> for the phoneme /ɨ ~ ɯ ~ ɤ/
·<Ṅ> for the *eng* sound /ŋ/
... .

So, a Turkish-based ASDF keyboard layout would do fine for typing in Qazaqi
using our Latin/Roman alphabet.

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 11:31 PM, Philippe Verdy via Unicode <
unicode_at_unicode.org> wrote:

> Sorry, but such English subtle interpretations are not in my mind, don't
> suppose everyone uses the second degree everytime something is posted here,
> these are just unneeded diversions causing trouble, it does not make the
> thread clear to follow.
>
> 2018-02-21 5:15 GMT+01:00 James Kass <jameskasskrv_at_gmail.com>:
>
>> Philippe, it was a jest. (Good one, too!)
>>
>
Received on Wed Feb 21 2018 - 00:11:21 CST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Feb 21 2018 - 00:11:21 CST