Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?

From: David Starner via Unicode <unicode_at_unicode.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 19:45:32 +0000

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 9:40 AM John W Kennedy via Unicode <
unicode_at_unicode.org> wrote:

> “Curmudgeonly” is a perfectly good English word attested back to 1590.
>

Curmudgeony may be identified as misspelled by Google, but it's got a bit
of usage dating back a hundred years. Wiktionary's entry at [[-y]] says
"This suffix is still very productive and can be added to almost any
word.", and that matches my feeling that this is a perfectly good word, a
perfectly wordy word, even if it wouldn't be used in formal English.
Received on Wed Feb 21 2018 - 13:46:23 CST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Feb 21 2018 - 13:46:23 CST