Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?

From: Asmus Freytag via Unicode <unicode_at_unicode.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 15:09:11 -0800
On 2/21/2018 11:45 AM, David Starner via Unicode wrote:
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 9:40 AM John W Kennedy via Unicode <unicode@unicode.org> wrote:
“Curmudgeonly” is a perfectly good English word attested back to 1590.

Curmudgeony may be identified as misspelled by Google, but it's got a bit of usage dating back a hundred years. Wiktionary's entry at [[-y]] says "This suffix is still very productive and can be added to almost any word.", and that matches my feeling that this is a perfectly good word, a perfectly wordy word, even if it wouldn't be used in formal English.

Normally the ending -ly would mark an adverb. But not in this case. Which may be why some people feel consciously or not that the "l" is extra.

A./

Received on Wed Feb 21 2018 - 17:09:32 CST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Feb 21 2018 - 17:09:32 CST