I understand there is no sufficient demand for the Unicode Consortium maintaining a supplementary non-ideographic variation database. Hence for the time being a kind of Private Use variation database seems to be the only solution - am I right?
The question comes down to resources, among
other things. As well as to whether
there are actual users / implementers waiting for and ready to
adopt such a database
as solution to their problems.
A strawman proposal could identify these
issues and some ways that they might be
addressed and then ask for criteria of what the UTC might deem
sufficient.
A./
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Jul 17 2018 - 10:33:45 CDT