Re: Condrabindu

From: John Cowan (cowan@locke.ccil.org)
Date: Wed May 31 2000 - 23:49:16 EDT

Next message: Marco.Cimarosti@icl.com: "RE: Clarifications on Thamizh Character Set Standardisations"
Previous message: Padma kumar .R: "Re: Clarifications on Thamizh Character Set Standardisations"
Maybe in reply to: Chookij Vanatham: "Condrabindu"
Next in thread: Martin Heijdra: "Re: Condrabindu"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Chookij Vanatham scripsit:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a quick question about "condrabindu" in unicode.
>
> Why does the unicode have 2 codepoints (U+0310 and U+0901) for
> "condrabindu" ?

The first is meant to be used with Latin transliteration, the second
with ordinary Devanagari writing.

-- 
John Cowan                                   cowan@ccil.org
	Yes, I know the message date is bogus.  I can't help it.
		--me, on far too many occasions

Next message: Marco.Cimarosti@icl.com: "RE: Clarifications on Thamizh Character Set Standardisations"
Previous message: Padma kumar .R: "Re: Clarifications on Thamizh Character Set Standardisations"
Maybe in reply to: Chookij Vanatham: "Condrabindu"
Next in thread: Martin Heijdra: "Re: Condrabindu"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:03 EDT