Re: FW: replay address (was: PDUTR #27: Unicode 3.1)

From: John Cowan (jcowan@reutershealth.com)
Date: Mon Jan 22 2001 - 10:03:38 EST

Next message: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: FW: replay address (was: PDUTR #27: Unicode 3.1)"
Previous message: Peter_Constable@sil.org: "anyone recognise this?"
Maybe in reply to: Mike Lischke: "FW: replay address (was: PDUTR #27: Unicode 3.1)"
Next in thread: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: FW: replay address (was: PDUTR #27: Unicode 3.1)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Mike Lischke wrote:

>>> PS: It seems that the that reply address in this mailing list is set to the
>>> original author instead the list itself. This is quite useless and requires
>>> manually edit of the target address when posting a reply. Could we please change
>>> the settings for this list so that the list address is by default the reply
>>> address? Thank you very much.
>>>
>>
>> I fully agree,

Please read "Reply-To Munging Considered Harmful"
(http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html) before you argue
further along these lines.

-- 
There is / one art             || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
no more / no less              || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things             || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness           \\ -- Piet Hein

Next message: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: FW: replay address (was: PDUTR #27: Unicode 3.1)"
Previous message: Peter_Constable@sil.org: "anyone recognise this?"
Maybe in reply to: Mike Lischke: "FW: replay address (was: PDUTR #27: Unicode 3.1)"
Next in thread: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: FW: replay address (was: PDUTR #27: Unicode 3.1)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:18 EDT