Please note that even at present, the Unicode List munges headers....
athough you might "reply all" and reply to both the list and the original
sender, the one posted to the list strips the original sender.
So we are already in a munge state here, just not as intrusive as the one
that would happen if the "reply to" header were explicitly set (as it is for
most egroups, I believe).
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Cowan" <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
To: "Unicode List" <unicode@unicode.org>
Cc: "Unicode List" <unicode@unicode.org>
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 6:42 AM
Subject: Re: FW: replay address (was: PDUTR #27: Unicode 3.1)
> Mike Lischke wrote:
>
> >>> PS: It seems that the that reply address in this mailing list is set
to the
> >>> original author instead the list itself. This is quite useless and
requires
> >>> manually edit of the target address when posting a reply. Could we
please change
> >>> the settings for this list so that the list address is by default the
reply
> >>> address? Thank you very much.
> >>>
> >>
> >> I fully agree,
>
> Please read "Reply-To Munging Considered Harmful"
> (http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html) before you argue
> further along these lines.
>
> --
> There is / one art || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
> no more / no less || http://www.reutershealth.com
> to do / all things || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
> with art- / lessness \\ -- Piet Hein
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:18 EDT