Re: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK)

From: Erik Garrés (egarres@hotmail.com)
Date: Thu Jan 25 2001 - 00:41:52 EST

Next message: Pierpaolo BERNARDI: "Re: Radical Index online? (was Re: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK))"
Previous message: Richard Cook: "Re: Radical Index online? (was Re: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK))"
Maybe in reply to: Erik Garrés: "Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK)"
Next in thread: Antoine Leca: "Re: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

--- In unicode@egroups.com, Michael Everson <everson@e...> wrote:

>There is no reason the Chinese or anyone else cannot write this [chemical
>elements] with LATIN
>CAPITAL LETTER O and SUBSCRIPT TWO.

If this is true, why was aproved the U+338E?

Note: U+338E is similar to "mg"
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Next message: Pierpaolo BERNARDI: "Re: Radical Index online? (was Re: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK))"
Previous message: Richard Cook: "Re: Radical Index online? (was Re: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK))"
Maybe in reply to: Erik Garrés: "Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK)"
Next in thread: Antoine Leca: "Re: Chemistry on chinesse. (CJK)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:18 EDT