Close enough

From: Dan Kolis (dank@hq.lindsayelec.com)
Date: Mon Feb 26 2001 - 13:17:49 EST

Next message: jgo: "Re: Implementing Complex Unicode Scripts"
Previous message: David Starner: "Re: bijective (was re: An Absurdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was"
Next in thread: Peter_Constable@sil.org: "Re: Close enough"
Maybe reply: Peter_Constable@sil.org: "Re: Close enough"
Maybe reply: P. T. Rourke: "Re: Close enough"
Maybe reply: John H. Jenkins: "Re: Close enough"
Maybe reply: DougEwell2@cs.com: "Re: Close enough"
Maybe reply: Francesco Zappa Nardelli: "Re: Close enough"
Maybe reply: P. T. Rourke: "Re: Close enough"
Maybe reply: John Cowan: "Re: Close enough"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Wait a minute.... You want to insert this:

ISOMORPHIC BOWL-OF-WRATH SPANNER WITH JEWS HARP ACCOMPANIMENT.

Can't you use instead the existing american equivelent?

"ISOMORPHIC BOWL-OF-WRATH WRENCH WITH JEWS HARP ACCOMPANIMENT"

Should be close enough....
Dan

Next message: jgo: "Re: Implementing Complex Unicode Scripts"
Previous message: David Starner: "Re: bijective (was re: An Absurdly Brief Introduction to Unicode (was"
Next in thread: Peter_Constable@sil.org: "Re: Close enough"
Maybe reply: Peter_Constable@sil.org: "Re: Close enough"
Maybe reply: P. T. Rourke: "Re: Close enough"
Maybe reply: John H. Jenkins: "Re: Close enough"
Maybe reply: DougEwell2@cs.com: "Re: Close enough"
Maybe reply: Francesco Zappa Nardelli: "Re: Close enough"
Maybe reply: P. T. Rourke: "Re: Close enough"
Maybe reply: John Cowan: "Re: Close enough"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:19 EDT