Another question similar to the Arabic one: The Tibetan block has two
characters with compatibility decompositions: 0f77 and 0f79. Why weren't
these given canonical decompositions like 0f78 etc? (These are discouraged
from use, but that could still have been done with canonical decompositions
along with excluding them from composition.)
- Peter
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Constable
Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International
7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA
Tel: +1 972 708 7485
E-mail: <peter_constable@sil.org>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Jul 06 2001 - 00:17:18 EDT