"Carl W. Brown" wrote:
> I warned my clients not to use
> surrogates with Oracle 8.x data bases. I also can not see that they could
> be so short sighted not to develop a full UTF-8 encoder. If MS can put
> surrogate support into Windows 2000, then they can put it into Oracle 8.0.
> I am sure that the development of Oracle 8.0 started much later that NT 5.0.
>
In fact, Oracle 8.0 development started in 1992 and it was released in 1994,
which should be much earlier than NT 5.0.
Regards,
Jianping.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Jul 06 2001 - 00:17:19 EDT