RE: Playing with Unicode (was: Re: UTF-17)

From: Carl W. Brown (cbrown@xnetinc.com)
Date: Tue Jun 26 2001 - 17:11:55 EDT

Next message: Jianping Yang: "Re: Playing with Unicode (was: Re: UTF-17)"
Previous message: Carl W. Brown: "RE: The perfect solution for the UTF-8/16 discussion"
In reply to: Jianping Yang: "Re: Playing with Unicode (was: Re: UTF-17)"
Next in thread: Jianping Yang: "Re: Playing with Unicode (was: Re: UTF-17)"
Reply: Jianping Yang: "Re: Playing with Unicode (was: Re: UTF-17)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Jianping,

> In fact, Oracle 8.0 development started in 1992 and it was
> released in 1994,
> which should be much earlier than NT 5.0.
>
Back then I was still using Oracle 7. Thank you for correcting me. What
made you chose UTF-8 back in 1992?

Is part of the problem that you use UCS-2 for CLOBs and UTF-8 for other data
giving you two sorting sequences in the same database?

Carl

Next message: Jianping Yang: "Re: Playing with Unicode (was: Re: UTF-17)"
Previous message: Carl W. Brown: "RE: The perfect solution for the UTF-8/16 discussion"
In reply to: Jianping Yang: "Re: Playing with Unicode (was: Re: UTF-17)"
Next in thread: Jianping Yang: "Re: Playing with Unicode (was: Re: UTF-17)"
Reply: Jianping Yang: "Re: Playing with Unicode (was: Re: UTF-17)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Jul 06 2001 - 00:17:19 EDT