Re: Is 879,309 enough?

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Tue Nov 06 2001 - 18:04:19 EST

Previous message: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: ISCII-Unicode Conversion"
In reply to: John H. Jenkins: "Re: Is 879,309 enough?"
Next in thread: Michael Everson: "Re: Is 879,309 enough?"
Next in thread: Rick McGowan: "Re: Is 879,309 enough?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 13:28 -0700 2001-11-06, John H. Jenkins wrote:

>The overwhelming majority of them are coming from medieval Korean
>Buddhist documents.

One can hardly complain, then. :-)

All hail the Alphabet,

-- 
Michael Everson *** Everson Typography *** http://www.evertype.com
15 Port Chaeimhghein Íochtarach; Baile Átha Cliath 2; Éire/Ireland
Telephone +353 86 807 9169 *** Fax +353 1 478 2597 (by arrangement)

Previous message: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: ISCII-Unicode Conversion"
In reply to: John H. Jenkins: "Re: Is 879,309 enough?"
Next in thread: Michael Everson: "Re: Is 879,309 enough?"
Next in thread: Rick McGowan: "Re: Is 879,309 enough?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Nov 06 2001 - 18:57:44 EST