Unicode Mail List Archive
By Author

Starting: Thu Nov 01 2001 - 01:11:00 EST
Ending: Fri Nov 30 2001 - 22:18:46 EST

• Addison Phillips [wM]
  • RE: How to print the byte representation of a wchar_t string with non -ASCII ... (Fri Nov 02 2001 - 13:35:04 EST)
• Alain LaBonté
  • Re: French uppercase accented letters (Fri Nov 30 2001 - 17:22:37 EST)
  • Re: French uppercase accented letters (was: Re: Comments on FCD 5218) (Fri Nov 30 2001 - 16:51:06 EST)
  • Re: Comments on FCD 5218, "Codes for the representation of human sexes" (Fri Nov 30 2001 - 16:45:25 EST)
  • Re: French uppercase accented letters (was: Re: Comments on FCD 5218) (Thu Nov 29 2001 - 18:18:47 EST)
  • Re: French uppercase accented letters (was: Re: Comments on FCD 5218) (Thu Nov 29 2001 - 14:13:56 EST)
• Alan Wood
  • RE: Compelling Unicode demo (Fri Nov 16 2001 - 06:51:51 EST)
• Andrew ``Bass'' Shcheglov
  • Re: Surrogates Question (Thu Nov 22 2001 - 16:08:58 EST)
• Arjun Aggarwal
  • The real solution (Fri Feb 25 2005 - 12:33:25 EST)
  • Re: What constitutes "character"? New Problem (Sat Nov 10 2001 - 12:41:33 EST)
  • Re: What constitutes "character"? (Thu Nov 08 2001 - 02:00:32 EST)
  • No proper representation of Devnagari in Unicode : CORRECTION (Thu Nov 01 2001 - 03:30:00 EST)
  • No proper representation of Devnagari in Unicode (Thu Nov 01 2001 - 03:22:41 EST)
• Asmus Freytag
  • Re: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution) (Wed Nov 28 2001 - 16:21:09 EST)
  • RE: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution) (Wed Nov 28 2001 - 16:26:10 EST)
  • Re: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution) (Wed Nov 28 2001 - 02:31:59 EST)
  • Re: restricting the meaning of characters over time (Tue Nov 13 2001 - 21:51:27 EST)
  • Re: restricting the meaning of characters over time (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 17:59:44 EST)
  • Re: Worst case scenarios on SCSU (Thu Nov 01 2001 - 02:03:55 EST)
• Audun H. Lona
  • RE: No proper representation of Devnagari in Unicode (Thu Nov 01 2001 - 04:21:20 EST)
• Becker, Joseph
  • Unicode 3.2 Codespace Counts (Fri Nov 09 2001 - 15:07:23 EST)
• Bernard Miller
  • Stupid question: what are half marks? (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 13:13:27 EST)
• Bob_Hallissy@sil.org
  • "visual bidi" ? (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 12:44:47 EST)
• C. Janardhana Gupta
  • RE: No proper representation of Devnagari in Unicode (Thu Nov 01 2001 - 04:23:58 EST)
• Carl W. Brown
  • xIUA testing with ICU 2.0 (Fri Nov 02 2001 - 12:11:20 EST)
• Charlie Jolly
  • Re: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution) (Mon Nov 26 2001 - 12:11:38 EST)
  • Arabic Script and Typography [slightly OT] (Fri Nov 23 2001 - 06:57:40 EST)
• Christopher J Fynn
  • RE: Planning a "Unicode Only" Week (Wed Nov 28 2001 - 22:52:27 EST)
• Craig Cameron
  • Removal from list (Tue Nov 20 2001 - 04:13:06 EST)
• Craig Ian Thomas
  • Removal from Mailing List. (Mon Nov 12 2001 - 10:45:28 EST)
• Daniel Yacob
  • Planning a "Unicode Only" Week (Wed Nov 28 2001 - 17:03:11 EST)
  • Feera: Ancient Script of the Afar (Thu Nov 22 2001 - 20:05:56 EST)
• David Hopwood
  • Re: Comments on FCD 5218, "Codes for the representation of human sexes" (Thu Nov 29 2001 - 14:55:24 EST)
• David Starner
  • Re: Good Unicode fonts (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 11:18:38 EST)
  • Re: Thank you for all the good information, sUTF32ToUTF8 function (Fri Nov 09 2001 - 11:58:12 EST)
  • Re: Good Unicode fonts (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 11:18:38 EST)
• Deborah Goldsmith
  • Re: Hawaiian glottal in Unicode? (Wed Nov 21 2001 - 17:40:27 EST)
  • Hawaiian glottal in Unicode? (Tue Nov 20 2001 - 14:00:40 EST)
• Dhrubajyoti Banerjee
  • Re: RE: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution) (Wed Nov 28 2001 - 13:47:33 EST)
  • Re: The real solution (Mon Nov 26 2001 - 06:12:51 EST)
  • Re: What constitutes "character"? (Fri Nov 09 2001 - 07:48:59 EST)
  • Re: Re: What constitutes "character"? New Problem (Sat Nov 10 2001 - 21:19:22 EST)
  • Re: Re: What constitutes "character"? (Sat Nov 10 2001 - 21:07:25 EST)
  • Re: What constitutes "character"? (Fri Nov 09 2001 - 07:48:59 EST)
• DougEwell2@cs.com
  • Re: Call for Papers - 21st Unicode Conference - May 2002 - Dublin (Fri Nov 30 2001 - 16:17:40 EST)
  • Re: Comments on FCD 5218, "Codes for the representation of human sexes" (Thu Nov 29 2001 - 12:28:50 EST)
  • French uppercase accented letters (was: Re: Comments on FCD 5218) (Thu Nov 29 2001 - 12:34:23 EST)
  • E-mail addresses for Viet-Std and TriChlor (Wed Nov 28 2001 - 09:53:34 EST)
  • Re: What is meant by '\u0000'? (Tue Nov 27 2001 - 02:19:38 EST)
  • Error in Roadmap page (Tue Nov 27 2001 - 02:19:39 EST)
  • Re: The real solution (Mon Nov 26 2001 - 01:33:29 EST)
  • Re: The real solution (Sun Nov 25 2001 - 15:30:55 EST)
  • Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo (Sun Nov 18 2001 - 23:01:04 EST)
  • Re: input method descriptions (Mon Nov 12 2001 - 10:34:10 EST)
  • Re: ______ input methods? (Thu Nov 08 2001 - 11:17:50 EST)
  • Re: Thank you for all the good information, sUTF32ToUTF8 function (Fri Nov 09 2001 - 00:35:08 EST)
  • Re: ______ input methods? (Thu Nov 08 2001 - 11:17:50 EST)
  • Re: ______ input methods? (Thu Nov 08 2001 - 01:24:39 EST)
  • Re: How to print the byte representation of a wchar_t string with non -ASCII ... (Fri Nov 02 2001 - 01:20:04 EST)
  • Re: Worst case scenarios on SCSU (Fri Nov 02 2001 - 01:20:14 EST)
  • Re: Worst case scenarios on SCSU (Thu Nov 01 2001 - 01:08:40 EST)
• Eric Muller
  • restricting the meaning of characters over time (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 14:26:24 EST)
  • Re: "visual bidi" ? (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 10:50:21 EST)
  • Re: restricting the meaning of characters over time (Thu Nov 08 2001 - 08:03:47 EST)
  • restricting the meaning of characters over time (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 14:26:24 EST)
  • Re: "visual bidi" ? (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 10:50:21 EST)
• Etienne Kroger
  • RE: French uppercase accented letters (Sat Dec 01 2001 - 00:33:48 EST)
• etienne99@nettaxi.com
  • ISCII-Unicode Conversion (Tue Nov 06 2001 - 14:00:29 EST)
  • ISCII-Unicode Conversion (Tue Nov 06 2001 - 14:00:29 EST)
• Fazakas Lehel
  • MSLU (Thu Nov 15 2001 - 03:21:00 EST)
• Frank da Cruz
  • Re: YO, ho ho, and a bottle of vodka (Mon Nov 05 2001 - 16:34:12 EST)
• G. Adam Stanislav
  • Re: No proper representation of Devnagari in Unicode : CORRECTION (Fri Nov 02 2001 - 15:22:29 EST)
• Gaspar Sinai
  • Re: What is meant by '\u0000'? (Tue Nov 27 2001 - 03:22:25 EST)
  • Re: The real solution (Mon Nov 26 2001 - 00:46:12 EST)
  • Re: What constitutes "character"? (Thu Nov 08 2001 - 04:54:27 EST)
• Geoffrey Waigh
  • Re: What constitutes "character"? (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 13:10:52 EST)
  • Re: What constitutes "character"? (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 13:10:52 EST)
• Hietaniemi Jarkko (NRC/Boston)
  • RE: transliterations (was compelling Unicode demo) (Fri Nov 16 2001 - 16:52:27 EST)
  • RE: Is 879,309 enough? (Tue Nov 06 2001 - 12:16:01 EST)
• hiura@eng.sun.com
  • Re: UNICODE ISO 10646 on Palm O/S 3.5 (Fri Nov 02 2001 - 17:16:28 EST)
• J M Sykes
  • Comments on FCD 5218, "Codes for the representation of human sexes" (Thu Nov 29 2001 - 05:16:20 EST)
• jameng.jin ½ð�V²¨
  • how to change the application (Fri Nov 23 2001 - 03:50:13 EST)
• James E. Agenbroad
  • Re: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution) (Mon Nov 26 2001 - 11:53:33 EST)
  • Cuneiform Article (Thu Nov 15 2001 - 09:51:22 EST)
  • Re: What constitutes "character"? (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 11:25:55 EST)
  • Re: What constitutes "character"? (Fri Nov 09 2001 - 15:57:02 EST)
  • Re: What constitutes "character"? (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 11:25:55 EST)
  • Re: No proper representation of Devnagari in Unicode (Thu Nov 01 2001 - 15:50:15 EST)
• James Kass
  • Re: Call for Papers - 21st Unicode Conference - May 2002 - Dublin (Fri Nov 30 2001 - 21:51:16 EST)
  • Re: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution) (Wed Nov 28 2001 - 07:21:37 EST)
  • Re: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution) (Wed Nov 28 2001 - 07:09:42 EST)
  • Re: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution) (Tue Nov 27 2001 - 15:37:26 EST)
  • Re: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution) (Tue Nov 27 2001 - 14:40:49 EST)
  • Re: The real solution (Sun Nov 25 2001 - 21:55:49 EST)
  • Re: The real solution (Sun Nov 25 2001 - 20:14:53 EST)
  • Re: Feera: Ancient Script of the Afar (Thu Nov 22 2001 - 22:00:18 EST)
  • Re: Surrogates Question (Thu Nov 22 2001 - 21:13:44 EST)
  • Re: What constitutes "character"? New Problem (Thu Nov 22 2001 - 20:21:37 EST)
  • Re: Code2001 font again (Wed Nov 21 2001 - 08:32:54 EST)
  • Re: What constitutes "character"? New Problem (Wed Nov 21 2001 - 03:39:11 EST)
  • Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo (Wed Nov 21 2001 - 02:46:12 EST)
  • Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo (Tue Nov 20 2001 - 00:32:15 EST)
  • Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo (Mon Nov 19 2001 - 23:49:18 EST)
  • Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo (Mon Nov 19 2001 - 09:45:11 EST)
  • Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo (Mon Nov 19 2001 - 00:57:03 EST)
  • Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo (Sun Nov 18 2001 - 23:23:47 EST)
  • Re: unicode demo: surrogates (Sun Nov 18 2001 - 04:54:24 EST)
  • Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo (Sun Nov 18 2001 - 00:48:15 EST)
  • Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo (Sat Nov 17 2001 - 22:48:47 EST)
  • Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo (Sat Nov 17 2001 - 18:59:54 EST)
  • Re: What constitutes "character"? New Problem (Mon Nov 12 2001 - 11:21:26 EST)
  • Re: Good Unicode fonts (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 14:40:53 EST)
  • Re: What constitutes "character"? (Thu Nov 08 2001 - 08:49:41 EST)
  • Re: Re: What constitutes "character"? New Problem (Sat Nov 10 2001 - 18:56:48 EST)
  • Re: What constitutes "character"? New Problem (Sat Nov 10 2001 - 16:50:10 EST)
  • Re: What constitutes "character"? (Thu Nov 08 2001 - 08:49:41 EST)
  • Re: Good Unicode fonts (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 14:40:53 EST)
• jen w
  • Displaying Negative Unicode on the Web (Wed Nov 21 2001 - 05:10:03 EST)
• John H. Jenkins
  • Re: Unicode<->CNS11643 mappings (Thu Nov 15 2001 - 10:57:39 EST)
  • Re: Monotype Hong Kong Extension mapping (Thu Nov 08 2001 - 10:35:37 EST)
  • Re: Is 879,309 enough? (Tue Nov 06 2001 - 15:28:40 EST)
  • Re: Is 879,309 enough? (Tue Nov 06 2001 - 11:02:48 EST)
• John Hudson
  • RE: French uppercase accented letters (Fri Nov 30 2001 - 22:14:17 EST)
  • Re: Comments on FCD 5218, "Codes for the representation of human sexes" (Thu Nov 29 2001 - 12:29:53 EST)
  • Re: Comments on FCD 5218, "Codes for the representation of human sexes" (Thu Nov 29 2001 - 12:33:16 EST)
  • Re: Comments on FCD 5218, "Codes for the representation of human sexes" (Thu Nov 29 2001 - 11:48:08 EST)
  • RE: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution) (Wed Nov 28 2001 - 08:54:02 EST)
  • RE: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution) (Wed Nov 28 2001 - 08:31:51 EST)
  • RE: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution) (Tue Nov 27 2001 - 13:21:11 EST)
  • RE: Compelling Unicode demo (Fri Nov 16 2001 - 14:25:12 EST)
  • Re: PostScript glyph names outside plane 0 (Thu Nov 15 2001 - 17:20:31 EST)
  • Re: Re: What constitutes "character"? New Problem (Sat Nov 10 2001 - 17:03:14 EST)
  • Re: What constitutes "character"? New Problem (Sat Nov 10 2001 - 16:47:45 EST)
  • Re: What constitutes "character"? (Thu Nov 08 2001 - 03:59:25 EST)
  • Re: ISCII-Unicode Conversion (Tue Nov 06 2001 - 15:45:11 EST)
  • Re: No proper representation of Devnagari in Unicode (Thu Nov 01 2001 - 04:21:48 EST)
• John McConnell
  • RE: ISCII-Unicode Conversion (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 19:08:53 EST)
  • RE: ISCII-Unicode Conversion (Thu Nov 08 2001 - 12:36:04 EST)
  • RE: ISCII-Unicode Conversion (Thu Nov 08 2001 - 12:36:04 EST)
  • RE: ISCII-Unicode Conversion (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 19:08:53 EST)
• John Wilcock
  • Re: Displaying Negative Unicode on the Web (Wed Nov 21 2001 - 07:06:47 EST)
• Jonathan Rosenne
  • RE: Compelling Unicode demo (Fri Nov 16 2001 - 10:48:19 EST)
• Jungshik Shin
  • RE: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution) (Wed Nov 28 2001 - 16:39:37 EST)
  • Re: FW: Query !! (Wed Nov 28 2001 - 15:25:13 EST)
  • Re: The real solution (Sun Nov 25 2001 - 22:02:25 EST)
  • Unicode support in WinXP home and WinXP pro? (Thu Nov 22 2001 - 11:13:36 EST)
  • Re: Displaying Negative Unicode on the Web (Wed Nov 21 2001 - 07:52:11 EST)
  • Another Chinese char. variant dictionary(was..Re: Is 879,309 enough?) (Fri Nov 09 2001 - 13:05:44 EST)
  • RE: How to print the byte representation of a wchar_t string with non -ASCII ... (Fri Nov 02 2001 - 20:07:25 EST)
  • Re: How to print the byte representation of a wchar_t string with non -ASCII ... (Thu Nov 01 2001 - 15:11:02 EST)
• juuichiketajin@ranmamail.com
  • Re: Planning a "Unicode Only" Week (Wed Nov 28 2001 - 18:00:53 EST)
  • What is meant by '\u0000'? (Mon Nov 26 2001 - 13:25:25 EST)
  • Why have planes? (Sat Nov 17 2001 - 20:45:17 EST)
  • romajiToKana function (Wed Nov 14 2001 - 13:17:49 EST)
  • Good Unicode fonts (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 01:45:41 EST)
• Keld Jørn Simonsen
  • Re: ______ input methods? (Fri Nov 09 2001 - 17:25:33 EST)
• Ken Krugler
  • Re: UNICODE ISO 10646 on Palm O/S 3.5 (Fri Nov 02 2001 - 16:50:53 EST)
• Kenneth Whistler
  • Re: Call for Papers - 21st Unicode Conference - May 2002 - Dublin (Fri Nov 30 2001 - 21:43:38 EST)
  • Re: French uppercase accented letters (was: Re: Comments on FCD 5218) (Thu Nov 29 2001 - 15:33:32 EST)
  • Re: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution) (Mon Nov 26 2001 - 11:14:07 EST)
  • Re: Displaying Negative Unicode on the Web (Wed Nov 21 2001 - 12:16:04 EST)
  • Re: Hawaiian glottal in Unicode? (Tue Nov 20 2001 - 14:42:42 EST)
  • Is 879,309 enough? (Mon Nov 05 2001 - 20:35:35 EST)
  • Re: YO, ho ho, and a bottle of vodka (Mon Nov 05 2001 - 18:46:40 EST)
  • Re: YO, ho ho, and a bottle of vodka (Mon Nov 05 2001 - 18:57:21 EST)
• Kevin Bracey
  • Unicode<->CNS11643 mappings (Thu Nov 15 2001 - 09:50:29 EST)
  • PostScript glyph names outside plane 0 (Thu Nov 15 2001 - 05:22:26 EST)
  • Re: Fw: Monotype Hong Kong Extension mapping (Thu Nov 15 2001 - 05:19:47 EST)
  • Re: Monotype Hong Kong Extension mapping (Thu Nov 08 2001 - 05:49:46 EST)
  • Monotype Hong Kong Extension mapping (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 07:33:00 EST)
  • Re: Monotype Hong Kong Extension mapping (Thu Nov 08 2001 - 05:49:46 EST)
  • Monotype Hong Kong Extension mapping (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 07:33:00 EST)
• Lars Kristan
  • RE: Unicode support in WinXP home and WinXP pro? (Fri Nov 23 2001 - 04:49:11 EST)
  • RE: transliterations (was Compelling Unicode demo) (Mon Nov 19 2001 - 16:35:35 EST)
  • RE: transliterations (was Compelling Unicode demo) (Mon Nov 19 2001 - 09:09:14 EST)
  • RE: Compelling Unicode demo (Fri Nov 16 2001 - 13:40:55 EST)
• Lars Marius Garshol
  • Re: Why have planes? (Sun Nov 18 2001 - 08:19:51 EST)
  • Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo (Sun Nov 18 2001 - 08:17:37 EST)
  • Re: Compelling Unicode demo (Fri Nov 16 2001 - 15:33:27 EST)
  • Re: Compelling Unicode demo (Fri Nov 16 2001 - 06:54:54 EST)
  • Re: YO, ho ho, and a bottle of vodka (Mon Nov 05 2001 - 16:54:48 EST)
  • Re: YO, ho ho, and a bottle of vodka (Mon Nov 05 2001 - 15:46:17 EST)
• M.W.Gemerts,MSc
  • unscribe from the list (Tue Nov 20 2001 - 14:21:39 EST)
• Magda Danish (Unicode)
  • FW: Query !! (Wed Nov 28 2001 - 13:28:44 EST)
  • UNICODE ISO 10646 on Palm O/S 3.5 (Fri Nov 02 2001 - 12:56:29 EST)
• Mansour, Kamal
  • RE: Monotype Hong Kong Extension mapping (Tue Nov 13 2001 - 15:05:21 EST)
• Marco Cimarosti
  • RE: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution) (Wed Nov 28 2001 - 12:11:11 EST)
  • RE: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution) (Wed Nov 28 2001 - 11:19:13 EST)
  • RE: RE: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution) (Wed Nov 28 2001 - 11:05:32 EST)
  • RE: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution) (Wed Nov 28 2001 - 06:14:42 EST)
  • RE: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution) (Wed Nov 28 2001 - 06:32:37 EST)
  • RE: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution) (Tue Nov 27 2001 - 13:47:16 EST)
  • RE: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution) (Tue Nov 27 2001 - 06:40:05 EST)
  • RE: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution) (Tue Nov 27 2001 - 05:41:21 EST)
  • Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution) (Mon Nov 26 2001 - 09:19:03 EST)
  • ZW(N)J in Indic scripts (was Re: Re: What constitutes "character" ? New Problem) (Fri Nov 23 2001 - 09:10:56 EST)
  • Accent-insensitive (was RE: transliterations (was Compelling Unic ode demo)) (Tue Nov 20 2001 - 08:42:08 EST)
  • Lost messages? (was RE: No proposal of hyphen addition) (Fri Nov 16 2001 - 04:22:37 EST)
  • RE: Is 879,309 enough? (Tue Nov 06 2001 - 13:26:14 EST)
  • RE: What constitutes "character"? (Fri Nov 09 2001 - 07:32:10 EST)
  • RE: What constitutes "character"? New Problem (Mon Nov 12 2001 - 04:28:56 EST)
  • RE: Question on script-name assignment (Fri Nov 09 2001 - 10:08:17 EST)
  • RE: What constitutes "character"? (Fri Nov 09 2001 - 07:32:10 EST)
  • RE: Is 879,309 enough? (Tue Nov 06 2001 - 13:26:14 EST)
  • [OT] Again on Trissino's orthography (was: RE: YO, ho ho, and a b ottle of vodka) (Mon Nov 05 2001 - 03:49:26 EST)
• Mark Davis
  • Re: ICU 2.0 Collation charts online (Mon Nov 05 2001 - 11:18:17 EST)
  • Re: No proper representation of Devnagari in Unicode (Thu Nov 01 2001 - 11:28:59 EST)
• Mark Leisher
  • MS contact for Outlook+Russian problem? (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 13:15:20 EST)
• Markus Scherer
  • Re: transliterations (was Compelling Unicode demo) (Mon Nov 19 2001 - 13:43:21 EST)
  • Re: USV to UTF-8 mapping (Wed Nov 14 2001 - 17:04:54 EST)
  • Re: ISCII-Unicode Conversion (Tue Nov 06 2001 - 16:59:24 EST)
  • Re: Thank you for all the good information, sUTF32ToUTF8 function (Fri Nov 09 2001 - 13:05:28 EST)
  • Re: ISCII-Unicode Conversion (Tue Nov 06 2001 - 16:59:24 EST)
  • ICU 2.0 Collation charts online (Fri Nov 02 2001 - 19:32:55 EST)
  • Re: Worst case scenarios on SCSU (Fri Nov 02 2001 - 12:34:15 EST)
• Martin Duerst
  • RE: Planning a "Unicode Only" Week (Thu Nov 29 2001 - 19:52:13 EST)
• Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
  • Re: Surrogates Question (Sat Nov 24 2001 - 23:40:58 EST)
  • Re: Surrogates Question (Thu Nov 22 2001 - 17:48:53 EST)
  • Re: Unicode support in WinXP home and WinXP pro? (Thu Nov 22 2001 - 14:58:01 EST)
  • Re: Code2001 font again (Wed Nov 21 2001 - 13:20:02 EST)
  • Re: Displaying Negative Unicode on the Web (Wed Nov 21 2001 - 13:17:11 EST)
  • Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo (Tue Nov 20 2001 - 14:04:44 EST)
  • Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo (Tue Nov 20 2001 - 12:10:31 EST)
  • Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo (Sun Nov 18 2001 - 22:45:56 EST)
  • Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo (Sun Nov 18 2001 - 17:46:11 EST)
  • Re: unicode demo: surrogates (Sun Nov 18 2001 - 17:49:21 EST)
  • Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo (Sat Nov 17 2001 - 18:18:09 EST)
  • Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo (Sat Nov 17 2001 - 18:17:04 EST)
  • Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo (Sat Nov 17 2001 - 16:09:47 EST)
  • Re: MSLU (Thu Nov 15 2001 - 11:01:00 EST)
  • Re: ᚠᚢᚦᚨᚱᚴ input methods? (Thu Nov 08 2001 - 12:22:23 EST)
  • Re: ᚠᚢᚦᚨᚱᚴ input methods? (Thu Nov 08 2001 - 12:22:23 EST)
  • Re: ISCII-Unicode Conversion (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 12:51:13 EST)
  • Re: ISCII-Unicode Conversion (Tue Nov 06 2001 - 18:01:39 EST)
  • Re: ISCII-Unicode Conversion (Tue Nov 06 2001 - 17:39:06 EST)
  • Re: ISCII-Unicode Conversion (Tue Nov 06 2001 - 14:41:31 EST)
• Michael Everson
  • Re: Comments on FCD 5218, "Codes for the representation of human sexes" (Thu Nov 29 2001 - 12:04:18 EST)
  • RE: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution) (Wed Nov 28 2001 - 08:24:04 EST)
  • RE: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution) (Tue Nov 27 2001 - 14:17:43 EST)
  • Re: Error in Roadmap page (Tue Nov 27 2001 - 08:27:08 EST)
  • Re: The real solution (Sun Nov 25 2001 - 17:52:56 EST)
  • OT: IrelandOffline (Sun Nov 18 2001 - 08:49:33 EST)
  • Re: No proposal of hyphen addition (Thu Nov 15 2001 - 17:58:50 EST)
  • Re: Is 879,309 enough? (Tue Nov 06 2001 - 11:41:42 EST)
  • Re: Is 879,309 enough? (Tue Nov 06 2001 - 18:04:19 EST)
  • Re: Is 879,309 enough? (Tue Nov 06 2001 - 11:41:42 EST)
  • Re: YO, ho ho, and a bottle of vodka (Thu Nov 01 2001 - 06:31:44 EST)
• Mike Lischke
  • RE: Compelling Unicode demo (Fri Nov 16 2001 - 05:07:24 EST)
• Misha.Wolf@reuters.com
  • Call for Papers - 21st Unicode Conference - May 2002 - Dublin (Fri Nov 30 2001 - 14:07:03 EST)
  • FW: Web Globalization and Unicode Experts to Meet in Washington, D.C. (Wed Nov 28 2001 - 15:08:46 EST)
  • 20th Unicode Conference, Jan 2002, Washington DC, USA -- Register now! (Mon Nov 19 2001 - 14:20:48 EST)
  • Call for Papers - 21st Unicode Conference - May 2002 - Dublin (Fri Nov 02 2001 - 14:59:52 EST)
• Mohammad Azadnia
  • Fw: Monotype Hong Kong Extension mapping (Wed Nov 14 2001 - 01:16:11 EST)
• Murray Sargent
  • RE: ISCII-Unicode Conversion (Tue Nov 06 2001 - 17:38:36 EST)
  • RE: ISCII-Unicode Conversion (Tue Nov 06 2001 - 17:38:36 EST)
• Otto Stolz
  • Re: Comments on FCD 5218, "Codes for the representation of human sexes" (Thu Nov 29 2001 - 07:43:00 EST)
  • Alternative Unicode demo (was: Compelling Unicode demo) (Wed Nov 14 2001 - 07:14:25 EST)
  • Re: YO, ho ho, and a bottle of vodka (Mon Nov 05 2001 - 11:10:12 EST)
• pani@vsnl.net
  • RE: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution) (Wed Nov 28 2001 - 11:23:38 EST)
• Peter_Constable@sil.org
  • Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo (Tue Nov 20 2001 - 13:28:38 EST)
  • Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo (Tue Nov 20 2001 - 11:18:38 EST)
  • Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo (Mon Nov 19 2001 - 14:41:55 EST)
  • It's part history and part convenient reference (was Re: Why have planes? (Sat Nov 17 2001 - 23:02:40 EST)
  • Re: USV to UTF-8 mapping (Wed Nov 14 2001 - 23:23:18 EST)
  • Re: USV to UTF-8 mapping (Wed Nov 14 2001 - 22:21:58 EST)
  • USV to UTF-8 mapping (Wed Nov 14 2001 - 11:15:06 EST)
  • Re: restricting the meaning of characters over time (Thu Nov 08 2001 - 08:33:48 EST)
  • RE: ISCII-Unicode Conversion (Thu Nov 08 2001 - 08:33:57 EST)
  • Re: ISCII-Unicode Conversion (Tue Nov 06 2001 - 16:19:58 EST)
  • Re: ᚠᚢᚦᚨᚱᚴ input methods? (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 22:54:59 EST)
  • input method descriptions (was Re: ______ input methods?) (Sun Nov 11 2001 - 22:56:15 EST)
  • Re: Thank you for all the good information, sUTF32ToUTF8 function (Fri Nov 09 2001 - 09:48:30 EST)
  • Thank you for all the good information, sUTF32ToUTF8 function (Thu Nov 08 2001 - 23:50:16 EST)
  • Re: ᚠᚢᚦᚨᚱᚴ input methods? (Thu Nov 08 2001 - 14:14:43 EST)
  • Unicode in the balance (was Re: What constitutes "character"?) (Thu Nov 08 2001 - 10:03:50 EST)
  • Re: ______ input methods? (Thu Nov 08 2001 - 10:03:47 EST)
  • Re: What constitutes "character"? (Thu Nov 08 2001 - 10:03:49 EST)
  • Re: restricting the meaning of characters over time (Thu Nov 08 2001 - 08:33:48 EST)
  • RE: ISCII-Unicode Conversion (Thu Nov 08 2001 - 08:33:57 EST)
  • Re: ᚠᚢᚦᚨᚱᚴ input methods? (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 22:54:59 EST)
  • Re: ISCII-Unicode Conversion (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 12:07:17 EST)
  • Re: ISCII-Unicode Conversion (Tue Nov 06 2001 - 16:19:58 EST)
• Philipp Reichmuth
  • Re: The real solution (Sun Nov 25 2001 - 16:20:14 EST)
  • What constitutes "character"? (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 09:59:15 EST)
  • What constitutes "character"? (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 09:59:15 EST)
  • Re: Is 879,309 enough? (Tue Nov 06 2001 - 12:36:26 EST)
• Ram Viswanadha
  • Re: ISCII-Unicode Conversion (Tue Nov 06 2001 - 16:33:21 EST)
  • Re: ISCII-Unicode Conversion (Tue Nov 06 2001 - 16:33:21 EST)
• Rick McGowan
  • Re: Is 879,309 enough? (Tue Nov 06 2001 - 11:36:22 EST)
  • New FAQ entries (Mon Nov 05 2001 - 17:25:42 EST)
  • Re: YO, ho ho, and a bottle of vodka (Mon Nov 05 2001 - 16:13:48 EST)
  • Re: No proper representation of Devnagari in Unicode : CORRECTION (Thu Nov 01 2001 - 13:30:39 EST)
• Sarasvati
  • Message problems (Mon Nov 12 2001 - 16:32:02 EST)
• Stefan Persson
  • ᚠᚢᚦᚨᚱᚴ input methods? (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 14:40:51 EST)
  • Re: ᚠᚢᚦᚨᚱᚴ input methods? (Thu Nov 08 2001 - 12:09:02 EST)
  • Re: ᚠᚢᚦᚨᚱᚴ input methods? (Thu Nov 08 2001 - 12:09:02 EST)
  • ᚠᚢᚦᚨᚱᚴ input methods? (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 14:40:51 EST)
• Suzanne M. Topping
  • RE: Planning a "Unicode Only" Week (Thu Nov 29 2001 - 10:37:00 EST)
• Séamas Ó Brógáin
  • Re: French uppercase accented letters (Fri Nov 30 2001 - 07:49:53 EST)
• Tay, William
  • RE: How to print the byte representation of a wchar_t string with non -ASCII ... (Fri Nov 02 2001 - 12:38:19 EST)
• Tex Texin
  • Re: What is meant by '\u0000'? (Tue Nov 27 2001 - 02:24:14 EST)
  • compelling unicode demo (Sun Nov 25 2001 - 04:41:10 EST)
  • enough for now. (Wed Nov 21 2001 - 11:31:15 EST)
  • Compelling unicode demo, Looking for Mr. Goodname. (Tue Nov 20 2001 - 14:03:58 EST)
  • Compelling Unicode Demo, Now with Plane 1 Supplementary characters! (Mon Nov 19 2001 - 13:17:34 EST)
  • Re: unicode demo: surrogates (Sun Nov 18 2001 - 17:37:25 EST)
  • Re: unicode demo: surrogates (Sun Nov 18 2001 - 02:09:27 EST)
  • Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo (Sat Nov 17 2001 - 18:12:22 EST)
  • Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo (Sat Nov 17 2001 - 18:17:19 EST)
  • Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo (Sat Nov 17 2001 - 12:22:30 EST)
  • transliterations (was compelling Unicode demo) (Fri Nov 16 2001 - 16:25:54 EST)
  • Re: Compelling Unicode demo (Fri Nov 16 2001 - 10:59:02 EST)
  • Re: Compelling Unicode demo (Fri Nov 16 2001 - 02:50:46 EST)
  • Re: Compelling Unicode demo (Wed Nov 14 2001 - 12:56:29 EST)
  • Re: Alternative Unicode demo (was: Compelling Unicode demo) (Wed Nov 14 2001 - 10:49:00 EST)
  • Re: Compelling Unicode demo (Wed Nov 14 2001 - 03:03:41 EST)
  • Compelling Unicode demo (Tue Nov 13 2001 - 02:16:49 EST)
  • Compelling Unicode demo (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 15:48:33 EST)
• Thierry Sourbier
  • Re: Comments on FCD 5218, "Codes for the representation of human sexes" (Fri Nov 30 2001 - 04:12:24 EST)
  • Re: French uppercase accented letters (was: Re: Comments on FCD 5218) (Fri Nov 30 2001 - 04:17:53 EST)
  • Re: Displaying Negative Unicode on the Web (Wed Nov 21 2001 - 05:47:04 EST)
  • Re: Removal from list (Tue Nov 20 2001 - 05:26:09 EST)
  • Re: romajiToKana function (Fri Nov 16 2001 - 05:03:33 EST)
• Thomas Chan
  • Re: Monotype Hong Kong Extension mapping (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 15:56:34 EST)
  • Re: Good Unicode fonts (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 15:53:38 EST)
• Tom Emerson
  • RE: Question on script-name assignment (Fri Nov 09 2001 - 16:40:35 EST)
  • Question on script-name assignment (Fri Nov 09 2001 - 09:22:23 EST)
• Tom Gewecke
  • Surrogates Question (Thu Nov 22 2001 - 15:07:19 EST)
• Youtie Effaight
  • Unicode in the balance (was Re: What constitutes "character"?) (Fri Nov 09 2001 - 02:36:59 EST)
  • Unicode in the balance (was Re: What constitutes "character"?) (Fri Nov 09 2001 - 02:36:59 EST)

Last message date: Fri Nov 30 2001 - 22:18:46 EST
Archived on: Fri Nov 30 2001 - 23:02:47 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Nov 30 2001 - 23:02:47 EST