Unicode Mail List Archive
By Date

Starting: Thu Nov 01 2001 - 01:11:00 EST
Ending: Fri Nov 30 2001 - 22:18:46 EST

• Re: Worst case scenarios on SCSU DougEwell2@cs.com (Thu Nov 01 2001 - 01:08:40 EST)
• Re: Worst case scenarios on SCSU Asmus Freytag (Thu Nov 01 2001 - 02:03:55 EST)
• No proper representation of Devnagari in Unicode Arjun Aggarwal (Thu Nov 01 2001 - 03:22:41 EST)
• No proper representation of Devnagari in Unicode : CORRECTION Arjun Aggarwal (Thu Nov 01 2001 - 03:30:00 EST)
• RE: No proper representation of Devnagari in Unicode Audun H. Lona (Thu Nov 01 2001 - 04:21:20 EST)
• Re: No proper representation of Devnagari in Unicode John Hudson (Thu Nov 01 2001 - 04:21:48 EST)
• RE: No proper representation of Devnagari in Unicode C. Janardhana Gupta (Thu Nov 01 2001 - 04:23:58 EST)
• Re: YO, ho ho, and a bottle of vodka Michael Everson (Thu Nov 01 2001 - 06:31:44 EST)
• Re: No proper representation of Devnagari in Unicode Mark Davis (Thu Nov 01 2001 - 11:28:59 EST)
• Re: No proper representation of Devnagari in Unicode : CORRECTION Rick McGowan (Thu Nov 01 2001 - 13:30:39 EST)
• Re: How to print the byte representation of a wchar_t string with non -ASCII ... Jungshik Shin (Thu Nov 01 2001 - 15:11:02 EST)
• Re: No proper representation of Devnagari in Unicode James E. Agenbroad (Thu Nov 01 2001 - 15:50:15 EST)
• Re: Worst case scenarios on SCSU DougEwell2@cs.com (Fri Nov 02 2001 - 01:20:14 EST)
• Re: How to print the byte representation of a wchar_t string with non -ASCII ... DougEwell2@cs.com (Fri Nov 02 2001 - 01:20:04 EST)
• Re: Worst case scenarios on SCSU Markus Scherer (Fri Nov 02 2001 - 12:34:15 EST)
• RE: How to print the byte representation of a wchar_t string with non -ASCII ... Tay, William (Fri Nov 02 2001 - 12:38:19 EST)
• UNICODE ISO 10646 on Palm O/S 3.5 Magda Danish (Unicode) (Fri Nov 02 2001 - 12:56:29 EST)
• xIUA testing with ICU 2.0 Carl W. Brown (Fri Nov 02 2001 - 12:11:20 EST)
• RE: How to print the byte representation of a wchar_t string with non -ASCII ... Addison Phillips [wM] (Fri Nov 02 2001 - 13:35:04 EST)
• Call for Papers - 21st Unicode Conference - May 2002 - Dublin Misha.Wolf@reuters.com (Fri Nov 02 2001 - 14:59:52 EST)
• Re: No proper representation of Devnagari in Unicode : CORRECTION G. Adam Stanislav (Fri Nov 02 2001 - 15:22:29 EST)
• Re: UNICODE ISO 10646 on Palm O/S 3.5 Ken Krugler (Fri Nov 02 2001 - 16:50:53 EST)
• Re: UNICODE ISO 10646 on Palm O/S 3.5 hiura@eng.sun.com (Fri Nov 02 2001 - 17:16:28 EST)
• ICU 2.0 Collation charts online Markus Scherer (Fri Nov 02 2001 - 19:32:55 EST)
• RE: How to print the byte representation of a wchar_t string with non -ASCII ... Jungshik Shin (Fri Nov 02 2001 - 20:07:25 EST)
• [OT] Again on Trissino's orthography (was: RE: YO, ho ho, and a b ottle of vodka) Marco Cimarosti (Mon Nov 05 2001 - 03:49:26 EST)
• Re: YO, ho ho, and a bottle of vodka Otto Stolz (Mon Nov 05 2001 - 11:10:12 EST)
• Re: ICU 2.0 Collation charts online Mark Davis (Mon Nov 05 2001 - 11:18:17 EST)
• Re: YO, ho ho, and a bottle of vodka Lars Marius Garshol (Mon Nov 05 2001 - 15:46:17 EST)
• Re: YO, ho ho, and a bottle of vodka Rick McGowan (Mon Nov 05 2001 - 16:13:48 EST)
• Re: YO, ho ho, and a bottle of vodka Frank da Cruz (Mon Nov 05 2001 - 16:34:12 EST)
• Re: YO, ho ho, and a bottle of vodka Lars Marius Garshol (Mon Nov 05 2001 - 16:54:48 EST)
• New FAQ entries Rick McGowan (Mon Nov 05 2001 - 17:25:42 EST)
• Re: YO, ho ho, and a bottle of vodka Kenneth Whistler (Mon Nov 05 2001 - 18:46:40 EST)
• Re: YO, ho ho, and a bottle of vodka Kenneth Whistler (Mon Nov 05 2001 - 18:57:21 EST)
• Is 879,309 enough? Kenneth Whistler (Mon Nov 05 2001 - 20:35:35 EST)
• Re: Is 879,309 enough? John H. Jenkins (Tue Nov 06 2001 - 11:02:48 EST)
• Re: Is 879,309 enough? Rick McGowan (Tue Nov 06 2001 - 11:36:22 EST)
• Re: Is 879,309 enough? Philipp Reichmuth (Tue Nov 06 2001 - 12:36:26 EST)
• RE: Is 879,309 enough? Marco Cimarosti (Tue Nov 06 2001 - 13:26:14 EST)
• ISCII-Unicode Conversion etienne99@nettaxi.com (Tue Nov 06 2001 - 14:00:29 EST)
• Re: Is 879,309 enough? Michael Everson (Tue Nov 06 2001 - 11:41:42 EST)
• RE: Is 879,309 enough? Hietaniemi Jarkko (NRC/Boston) (Tue Nov 06 2001 - 12:16:01 EST)
• Re: ISCII-Unicode Conversion Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (Tue Nov 06 2001 - 14:41:31 EST)
• Re: Is 879,309 enough? John H. Jenkins (Tue Nov 06 2001 - 15:28:40 EST)
• Re: ISCII-Unicode Conversion John Hudson (Tue Nov 06 2001 - 15:45:11 EST)
• Re: ISCII-Unicode Conversion Ram Viswanadha (Tue Nov 06 2001 - 16:33:21 EST)
• Re: ISCII-Unicode Conversion Markus Scherer (Tue Nov 06 2001 - 16:59:24 EST)
• Re: ISCII-Unicode Conversion Peter_Constable@sil.org (Tue Nov 06 2001 - 16:19:58 EST)
• RE: ISCII-Unicode Conversion Murray Sargent (Tue Nov 06 2001 - 17:38:36 EST)
• Re: ISCII-Unicode Conversion Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (Tue Nov 06 2001 - 17:39:06 EST)
• Re: ISCII-Unicode Conversion Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (Tue Nov 06 2001 - 18:01:39 EST)
• Re: Is 879,309 enough? Michael Everson (Tue Nov 06 2001 - 18:04:19 EST)
• Good Unicode fonts juuichiketajin@ranmamail.com (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 01:45:41 EST)
• Monotype Hong Kong Extension mapping Kevin Bracey (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 07:33:00 EST)
• What constitutes "character"? Philipp Reichmuth (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 09:59:15 EST)
• Re: Good Unicode fonts David Starner (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 11:18:38 EST)
• Re: What constitutes "character"? James E. Agenbroad (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 11:25:55 EST)
• Re: ISCII-Unicode Conversion Peter_Constable@sil.org (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 12:07:17 EST)
• "visual bidi" ? Bob_Hallissy@sil.org (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 12:44:47 EST)
• Stupid question: what are half marks? Bernard Miller (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 13:13:27 EST)
• MS contact for Outlook+Russian problem? Mark Leisher (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 13:15:20 EST)
• Re: What constitutes "character"? Geoffrey Waigh (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 13:10:52 EST)
• Re: "visual bidi" ? Eric Muller (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 10:50:21 EST)
• Re: Good Unicode fonts James Kass (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 14:40:53 EST)
• ᚠᚢᚦᚨᚱᚴ input methods? Stefan Persson (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 14:40:51 EST)
• Re: ISCII-Unicode Conversion Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 12:51:13 EST)
• Compelling Unicode demo Tex Texin (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 15:48:33 EST)
• Re: Good Unicode fonts Thomas Chan (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 15:53:38 EST)
• Re: Monotype Hong Kong Extension mapping Thomas Chan (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 15:56:34 EST)
• restricting the meaning of characters over time Eric Muller (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 14:26:24 EST)
• Re: restricting the meaning of characters over time Asmus Freytag (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 17:59:44 EST)
• RE: ISCII-Unicode Conversion John McConnell (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 19:08:53 EST)
• Re: ᚠᚢᚦᚨᚱᚴ input methods? Peter_Constable@sil.org (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 22:54:59 EST)
• Re: ______ input methods? DougEwell2@cs.com (Thu Nov 08 2001 - 01:24:39 EST)
• Re: What constitutes "character"? Arjun Aggarwal (Thu Nov 08 2001 - 02:00:32 EST)
• Re: What constitutes "character"? John Hudson (Thu Nov 08 2001 - 03:59:25 EST)
• Re: What constitutes "character"? Gaspar Sinai (Thu Nov 08 2001 - 04:54:27 EST)
• Re: Monotype Hong Kong Extension mapping Kevin Bracey (Thu Nov 08 2001 - 05:49:46 EST)
• Re: What constitutes "character"? James Kass (Thu Nov 08 2001 - 08:49:41 EST)
• RE: ISCII-Unicode Conversion Peter_Constable@sil.org (Thu Nov 08 2001 - 08:33:57 EST)
• Re: restricting the meaning of characters over time Peter_Constable@sil.org (Thu Nov 08 2001 - 08:33:48 EST)
• Re: ______ input methods? Peter_Constable@sil.org (Thu Nov 08 2001 - 10:03:47 EST)
• Unicode in the balance (was Re: What constitutes "character"?) Peter_Constable@sil.org (Thu Nov 08 2001 - 10:03:50 EST)
• Re: What constitutes "character"? Peter_Constable@sil.org (Thu Nov 08 2001 - 10:03:49 EST)
• Re: Monotype Hong Kong Extension mapping John H. Jenkins (Thu Nov 08 2001 - 10:35:37 EST)
• Re: ______ input methods? DougEwell2@cs.com (Thu Nov 08 2001 - 11:17:50 EST)
• Re: ᚠᚢᚦᚨᚱᚴ input methods? Stefan Persson (Thu Nov 08 2001 - 12:09:02 EST)
• Re: ᚠᚢᚦᚨᚱᚴ input methods? Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (Thu Nov 08 2001 - 12:22:23 EST)
• RE: ISCII-Unicode Conversion John McConnell (Thu Nov 08 2001 - 12:36:04 EST)
• Re: restricting the meaning of characters over time Eric Muller (Thu Nov 08 2001 - 08:03:47 EST)
• Re: ᚠᚢᚦᚨᚱᚴ input methods? Peter_Constable@sil.org (Thu Nov 08 2001 - 14:14:43 EST)
• Thank you for all the good information, sUTF32ToUTF8 function Peter_Constable@sil.org (Thu Nov 08 2001 - 23:50:16 EST)
• Re: Thank you for all the good information, sUTF32ToUTF8 function DougEwell2@cs.com (Fri Nov 09 2001 - 00:35:08 EST)
• Unicode in the balance (was Re: What constitutes "character"?) Youtie Effaight (Fri Nov 09 2001 - 02:36:59 EST)
• Re: What constitutes "character"? Dhrubajyoti Banerjee (Fri Nov 09 2001 - 07:48:59 EST)
• RE: What constitutes "character"? Marco Cimarosti (Fri Nov 09 2001 - 07:32:10 EST)
• Question on script-name assignment Tom Emerson (Fri Nov 09 2001 - 09:22:23 EST)
• Re: Thank you for all the good information, sUTF32ToUTF8 function Peter_Constable@sil.org (Fri Nov 09 2001 - 09:48:30 EST)
• RE: Question on script-name assignment Marco Cimarosti (Fri Nov 09 2001 - 10:08:17 EST)
• Re: Thank you for all the good information, sUTF32ToUTF8 function David Starner (Fri Nov 09 2001 - 11:58:12 EST)
• Another Chinese char. variant dictionary(was..Re: Is 879,309 enough?) Jungshik Shin (Fri Nov 09 2001 - 13:05:44 EST)
• Re: Thank you for all the good information, sUTF32ToUTF8 function Markus Scherer (Fri Nov 09 2001 - 13:05:28 EST)
• Unicode 3.2 Codespace Counts Becker, Joseph (Fri Nov 09 2001 - 15:07:23 EST)
• Re: What constitutes "character"? James E. Agenbroad (Fri Nov 09 2001 - 15:57:02 EST)
• RE: Question on script-name assignment Tom Emerson (Fri Nov 09 2001 - 16:40:35 EST)
• Re: ______ input methods? Keld J�rn Simonsen (Fri Nov 09 2001 - 17:25:33 EST)
• Re: What constitutes "character"? New Problem Arjun Aggarwal (Sat Nov 10 2001 - 12:41:33 EST)
• Re: What constitutes "character"? New Problem James Kass (Sat Nov 10 2001 - 16:50:10 EST)
• Re: Re: What constitutes "character"? Dhrubajyoti Banerjee (Sat Nov 10 2001 - 21:07:25 EST)
• Re: Re: What constitutes "character"? New Problem Dhrubajyoti Banerjee (Sat Nov 10 2001 - 21:19:22 EST)
• Re: What constitutes "character"? New Problem John Hudson (Sat Nov 10 2001 - 16:47:45 EST)
• Re: Re: What constitutes "character"? New Problem John Hudson (Sat Nov 10 2001 - 17:03:14 EST)
• Re: Re: What constitutes "character"? New Problem James Kass (Sat Nov 10 2001 - 18:56:48 EST)
• input method descriptions (was Re: ______ input methods?) Peter_Constable@sil.org (Sun Nov 11 2001 - 22:56:15 EST)
• RE: What constitutes "character"? New Problem Marco Cimarosti (Mon Nov 12 2001 - 04:28:56 EST)
• Re: Is 879,309 enough? Michael Everson (Tue Nov 06 2001 - 11:41:42 EST)
• Re: What constitutes "character"? James Kass (Thu Nov 08 2001 - 08:49:41 EST)
• Unicode in the balance (was Re: What constitutes "character"?) Youtie Effaight (Fri Nov 09 2001 - 02:36:59 EST)
• Re: What constitutes "character"? James E. Agenbroad (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 11:25:55 EST)
• Re: restricting the meaning of characters over time Peter_Constable@sil.org (Thu Nov 08 2001 - 08:33:48 EST)
• Monotype Hong Kong Extension mapping Kevin Bracey (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 07:33:00 EST)
• Re: Monotype Hong Kong Extension mapping Kevin Bracey (Thu Nov 08 2001 - 05:49:46 EST)
• RE: ISCII-Unicode Conversion Peter_Constable@sil.org (Thu Nov 08 2001 - 08:33:57 EST)
• Re: Good Unicode fonts David Starner (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 11:18:38 EST)
• Re: What constitutes "character"? Geoffrey Waigh (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 13:10:52 EST)
• Re: ______ input methods? DougEwell2@cs.com (Thu Nov 08 2001 - 11:17:50 EST)
• Re: ᚠᚢᚦᚨᚱᚴ input methods? Peter_Constable@sil.org (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 22:54:59 EST)
• RE: ISCII-Unicode Conversion John McConnell (Thu Nov 08 2001 - 12:36:04 EST)
• RE: ISCII-Unicode Conversion Murray Sargent (Tue Nov 06 2001 - 17:38:36 EST)
• What constitutes "character"? Philipp Reichmuth (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 09:59:15 EST)
• Re: ᚠᚢᚦᚨᚱᚴ input methods? Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (Thu Nov 08 2001 - 12:22:23 EST)
• Re: "visual bidi" ? Eric Muller (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 10:50:21 EST)
• RE: What constitutes "character"? Marco Cimarosti (Fri Nov 09 2001 - 07:32:10 EST)
• Re: ᚠᚢᚦᚨᚱᚴ input methods? Stefan Persson (Thu Nov 08 2001 - 12:09:02 EST)
• Re: ISCII-Unicode Conversion Peter_Constable@sil.org (Tue Nov 06 2001 - 16:19:58 EST)
• ᚠᚢᚦᚨᚱᚴ input methods? Stefan Persson (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 14:40:51 EST)
• RE: ISCII-Unicode Conversion John McConnell (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 19:08:53 EST)
• Re: ISCII-Unicode Conversion Markus Scherer (Tue Nov 06 2001 - 16:59:24 EST)
• ISCII-Unicode Conversion etienne99@nettaxi.com (Tue Nov 06 2001 - 14:00:29 EST)
• restricting the meaning of characters over time Eric Muller (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 14:26:24 EST)
• RE: Is 879,309 enough? Marco Cimarosti (Tue Nov 06 2001 - 13:26:14 EST)
• Re: Good Unicode fonts James Kass (Wed Nov 07 2001 - 14:40:53 EST)
• Re: What constitutes "character"? Dhrubajyoti Banerjee (Fri Nov 09 2001 - 07:48:59 EST)
• Re: ISCII-Unicode Conversion Ram Viswanadha (Tue Nov 06 2001 - 16:33:21 EST)
• Re: What constitutes "character"? New Problem James Kass (Mon Nov 12 2001 - 11:21:26 EST)
• Re: input method descriptions DougEwell2@cs.com (Mon Nov 12 2001 - 10:34:10 EST)
• Removal from Mailing List. Craig Ian Thomas (Mon Nov 12 2001 - 10:45:28 EST)
• Message problems Sarasvati (Mon Nov 12 2001 - 16:32:02 EST)
• Compelling Unicode demo Tex Texin (Tue Nov 13 2001 - 02:16:49 EST)
• RE: Monotype Hong Kong Extension mapping Mansour, Kamal (Tue Nov 13 2001 - 15:05:21 EST)
• Re: restricting the meaning of characters over time Asmus Freytag (Tue Nov 13 2001 - 21:51:27 EST)
• Fw: Monotype Hong Kong Extension mapping Mohammad Azadnia (Wed Nov 14 2001 - 01:16:11 EST)
• Re: Compelling Unicode demo Tex Texin (Wed Nov 14 2001 - 03:03:41 EST)
• Alternative Unicode demo (was: Compelling Unicode demo) Otto Stolz (Wed Nov 14 2001 - 07:14:25 EST)
• Re: Alternative Unicode demo (was: Compelling Unicode demo) Tex Texin (Wed Nov 14 2001 - 10:49:00 EST)
• USV to UTF-8 mapping Peter_Constable@sil.org (Wed Nov 14 2001 - 11:15:06 EST)
• Re: Compelling Unicode demo Tex Texin (Wed Nov 14 2001 - 12:56:29 EST)
• romajiToKana function juuichiketajin@ranmamail.com (Wed Nov 14 2001 - 13:17:49 EST)
• Re: USV to UTF-8 mapping Markus Scherer (Wed Nov 14 2001 - 17:04:54 EST)
• Re: USV to UTF-8 mapping Peter_Constable@sil.org (Wed Nov 14 2001 - 22:21:58 EST)
• Re: USV to UTF-8 mapping Peter_Constable@sil.org (Wed Nov 14 2001 - 23:23:18 EST)
• MSLU Fazakas Lehel (Thu Nov 15 2001 - 03:21:00 EST)
• Re: Fw: Monotype Hong Kong Extension mapping Kevin Bracey (Thu Nov 15 2001 - 05:19:47 EST)
• PostScript glyph names outside plane 0 Kevin Bracey (Thu Nov 15 2001 - 05:22:26 EST)
• Unicode<->CNS11643 mappings Kevin Bracey (Thu Nov 15 2001 - 09:50:29 EST)
• Cuneiform Article James E. Agenbroad (Thu Nov 15 2001 - 09:51:22 EST)
• Re: Unicode<->CNS11643 mappings John H. Jenkins (Thu Nov 15 2001 - 10:57:39 EST)
• Re: MSLU Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (Thu Nov 15 2001 - 11:01:00 EST)
• Re: PostScript glyph names outside plane 0 John Hudson (Thu Nov 15 2001 - 17:20:31 EST)
• Re: No proposal of hyphen addition Michael Everson (Thu Nov 15 2001 - 17:58:50 EST)
• Re: Compelling Unicode demo Tex Texin (Fri Nov 16 2001 - 02:50:46 EST)
• Lost messages? (was RE: No proposal of hyphen addition) Marco Cimarosti (Fri Nov 16 2001 - 04:22:37 EST)
• Re: romajiToKana function Thierry Sourbier (Fri Nov 16 2001 - 05:03:33 EST)
• RE: Compelling Unicode demo Mike Lischke (Fri Nov 16 2001 - 05:07:24 EST)
• Re: Compelling Unicode demo Lars Marius Garshol (Fri Nov 16 2001 - 06:54:54 EST)
• RE: Compelling Unicode demo Alan Wood (Fri Nov 16 2001 - 06:51:51 EST)
• RE: Compelling Unicode demo Jonathan Rosenne (Fri Nov 16 2001 - 10:48:19 EST)
• Re: Compelling Unicode demo Tex Texin (Fri Nov 16 2001 - 10:59:02 EST)
• RE: Compelling Unicode demo Lars Kristan (Fri Nov 16 2001 - 13:40:55 EST)
• RE: Compelling Unicode demo John Hudson (Fri Nov 16 2001 - 14:25:12 EST)
• Re: Compelling Unicode demo Lars Marius Garshol (Fri Nov 16 2001 - 15:33:27 EST)
• transliterations (was compelling Unicode demo) Tex Texin (Fri Nov 16 2001 - 16:25:54 EST)
• RE: transliterations (was compelling Unicode demo) Hietaniemi Jarkko (NRC/Boston) (Fri Nov 16 2001 - 16:52:27 EST)
• Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo Tex Texin (Sat Nov 17 2001 - 12:22:30 EST)
• Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (Sat Nov 17 2001 - 16:09:47 EST)
• Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo James Kass (Sat Nov 17 2001 - 18:59:54 EST)
• Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo Tex Texin (Sat Nov 17 2001 - 18:12:22 EST)
• Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo Tex Texin (Sat Nov 17 2001 - 18:17:19 EST)
• Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (Sat Nov 17 2001 - 18:17:04 EST)
• Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (Sat Nov 17 2001 - 18:18:09 EST)
• Why have planes? juuichiketajin@ranmamail.com (Sat Nov 17 2001 - 20:45:17 EST)
• Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo James Kass (Sat Nov 17 2001 - 22:48:47 EST)
• It's part history and part convenient reference (was Re: Why have planes? Peter_Constable@sil.org (Sat Nov 17 2001 - 23:02:40 EST)
• Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo James Kass (Sun Nov 18 2001 - 00:48:15 EST)
• Re: unicode demo: surrogates Tex Texin (Sun Nov 18 2001 - 02:09:27 EST)
• Re: unicode demo: surrogates James Kass (Sun Nov 18 2001 - 04:54:24 EST)
• Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo Lars Marius Garshol (Sun Nov 18 2001 - 08:17:37 EST)
• Re: Why have planes? Lars Marius Garshol (Sun Nov 18 2001 - 08:19:51 EST)
• OT: IrelandOffline Michael Everson (Sun Nov 18 2001 - 08:49:33 EST)
• Re: unicode demo: surrogates Tex Texin (Sun Nov 18 2001 - 17:37:25 EST)
• Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (Sun Nov 18 2001 - 17:46:11 EST)
• Re: unicode demo: surrogates Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (Sun Nov 18 2001 - 17:49:21 EST)
• Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo James Kass (Sun Nov 18 2001 - 23:23:47 EST)
• Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (Sun Nov 18 2001 - 22:45:56 EST)
• Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo DougEwell2@cs.com (Sun Nov 18 2001 - 23:01:04 EST)
• Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo James Kass (Mon Nov 19 2001 - 00:57:03 EST)
• Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo James Kass (Mon Nov 19 2001 - 09:45:11 EST)
• RE: transliterations (was Compelling Unicode demo) Lars Kristan (Mon Nov 19 2001 - 09:09:14 EST)
• Compelling Unicode Demo, Now with Plane 1 Supplementary characters! Tex Texin (Mon Nov 19 2001 - 13:17:34 EST)
• Re: transliterations (was Compelling Unicode demo) Markus Scherer (Mon Nov 19 2001 - 13:43:21 EST)
• 20th Unicode Conference, Jan 2002, Washington DC, USA -- Register now! Misha.Wolf@reuters.com (Mon Nov 19 2001 - 14:20:48 EST)
• RE: transliterations (was Compelling Unicode demo) Lars Kristan (Mon Nov 19 2001 - 16:35:35 EST)
• Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo Peter_Constable@sil.org (Mon Nov 19 2001 - 14:41:55 EST)
• Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo James Kass (Mon Nov 19 2001 - 23:49:18 EST)
• Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo James Kass (Tue Nov 20 2001 - 00:32:15 EST)
• Removal from list Craig Cameron (Tue Nov 20 2001 - 04:13:06 EST)
• Re: Removal from list Thierry Sourbier (Tue Nov 20 2001 - 05:26:09 EST)
• Accent-insensitive (was RE: transliterations (was Compelling Unic ode demo)) Marco Cimarosti (Tue Nov 20 2001 - 08:42:08 EST)
• Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo Peter_Constable@sil.org (Tue Nov 20 2001 - 11:18:38 EST)
• Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (Tue Nov 20 2001 - 12:10:31 EST)
• Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo Peter_Constable@sil.org (Tue Nov 20 2001 - 13:28:38 EST)
• Hawaiian glottal in Unicode? Deborah Goldsmith (Tue Nov 20 2001 - 14:00:40 EST)
• Compelling unicode demo, Looking for Mr. Goodname. Tex Texin (Tue Nov 20 2001 - 14:03:58 EST)
• Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (Tue Nov 20 2001 - 14:04:44 EST)
• unscribe from the list M.W.Gemerts,MSc (Tue Nov 20 2001 - 14:21:39 EST)
• Re: Hawaiian glottal in Unicode? Kenneth Whistler (Tue Nov 20 2001 - 14:42:42 EST)
• Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo James Kass (Wed Nov 21 2001 - 02:46:12 EST)
• Re: What constitutes "character"? New Problem James Kass (Wed Nov 21 2001 - 03:39:11 EST)
• Displaying Negative Unicode on the Web jen w (Wed Nov 21 2001 - 05:10:03 EST)
• Re: Displaying Negative Unicode on the Web Thierry Sourbier (Wed Nov 21 2001 - 05:47:04 EST)
• Re: Displaying Negative Unicode on the Web John Wilcock (Wed Nov 21 2001 - 07:06:47 EST)
• Re: Code2001 font again James Kass (Wed Nov 21 2001 - 08:32:54 EST)
• Re: Displaying Negative Unicode on the Web Jungshik Shin (Wed Nov 21 2001 - 07:52:11 EST)
• enough for now. Tex Texin (Wed Nov 21 2001 - 11:31:15 EST)
• Re: Displaying Negative Unicode on the Web Kenneth Whistler (Wed Nov 21 2001 - 12:16:04 EST)
• Re: Displaying Negative Unicode on the Web Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (Wed Nov 21 2001 - 13:17:11 EST)
• Re: Code2001 font again Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (Wed Nov 21 2001 - 13:20:02 EST)
• Re: Hawaiian glottal in Unicode? Deborah Goldsmith (Wed Nov 21 2001 - 17:40:27 EST)
• Unicode support in WinXP home and WinXP pro? Jungshik Shin (Thu Nov 22 2001 - 11:13:36 EST)
• Re: Unicode support in WinXP home and WinXP pro? Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (Thu Nov 22 2001 - 14:58:01 EST)
• Surrogates Question Tom Gewecke (Thu Nov 22 2001 - 15:07:19 EST)
• Re: Surrogates Question Andrew ``Bass'' Shcheglov (Thu Nov 22 2001 - 16:08:58 EST)
• Re: Surrogates Question Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (Thu Nov 22 2001 - 17:48:53 EST)
• Re: What constitutes "character"? New Problem James Kass (Thu Nov 22 2001 - 20:21:37 EST)
• Feera: Ancient Script of the Afar Daniel Yacob (Thu Nov 22 2001 - 20:05:56 EST)
• Re: Surrogates Question James Kass (Thu Nov 22 2001 - 21:13:44 EST)
• Re: Feera: Ancient Script of the Afar James Kass (Thu Nov 22 2001 - 22:00:18 EST)
• how to change the application jameng.jin ���V�� (Fri Nov 23 2001 - 03:50:13 EST)
• RE: Unicode support in WinXP home and WinXP pro? Lars Kristan (Fri Nov 23 2001 - 04:49:11 EST)
• Arabic Script and Typography [slightly OT] Charlie Jolly (Fri Nov 23 2001 - 06:57:40 EST)
• ZW(N)J in Indic scripts (was Re: Re: What constitutes "character" ? New Problem) Marco Cimarosti (Fri Nov 23 2001 - 09:10:56 EST)
• Re: Surrogates Question Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (Sat Nov 24 2001 - 23:40:58 EST)
• compelling unicode demo Tex Texin (Sun Nov 25 2001 - 04:41:10 EST)
• The real solution Arjun Aggarwal (Fri Feb 25 2005 - 12:33:25 EST)
• Re: The real solution DougEwell2@cs.com (Sun Nov 25 2001 - 15:30:55 EST)
• Re: The real solution Philipp Reichmuth (Sun Nov 25 2001 - 16:20:14 EST)
• Re: The real solution Michael Everson (Sun Nov 25 2001 - 17:52:56 EST)
• Re: The real solution James Kass (Sun Nov 25 2001 - 20:14:53 EST)
• Re: The real solution James Kass (Sun Nov 25 2001 - 21:55:49 EST)
• Re: The real solution Jungshik Shin (Sun Nov 25 2001 - 22:02:25 EST)
• Re: The real solution Gaspar Sinai (Mon Nov 26 2001 - 00:46:12 EST)
• Re: The real solution Dhrubajyoti Banerjee (Mon Nov 26 2001 - 06:12:51 EST)
• Re: The real solution DougEwell2@cs.com (Mon Nov 26 2001 - 01:33:29 EST)
• Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution) Marco Cimarosti (Mon Nov 26 2001 - 09:19:03 EST)
• Re: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution) Kenneth Whistler (Mon Nov 26 2001 - 11:14:07 EST)
• Re: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution) James E. Agenbroad (Mon Nov 26 2001 - 11:53:33 EST)
• Re: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution) Charlie Jolly (Mon Nov 26 2001 - 12:11:38 EST)
• What is meant by '\u0000'? juuichiketajin@ranmamail.com (Mon Nov 26 2001 - 13:25:25 EST)
• Error in Roadmap page DougEwell2@cs.com (Tue Nov 27 2001 - 02:19:39 EST)
• Re: What is meant by '\u0000'? DougEwell2@cs.com (Tue Nov 27 2001 - 02:19:38 EST)
• Re: What is meant by '\u0000'? Tex Texin (Tue Nov 27 2001 - 02:24:14 EST)
• Re: What is meant by '\u0000'? Gaspar Sinai (Tue Nov 27 2001 - 03:22:25 EST)
• RE: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution) Marco Cimarosti (Tue Nov 27 2001 - 05:41:21 EST)
• RE: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution) Marco Cimarosti (Tue Nov 27 2001 - 06:40:05 EST)
• Re: Error in Roadmap page Michael Everson (Tue Nov 27 2001 - 08:27:08 EST)
• RE: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution) John Hudson (Tue Nov 27 2001 - 13:21:11 EST)
• Re: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution) James Kass (Tue Nov 27 2001 - 14:40:49 EST)
• RE: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution) Marco Cimarosti (Tue Nov 27 2001 - 13:47:16 EST)
• RE: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution) Michael Everson (Tue Nov 27 2001 - 14:17:43 EST)
• Re: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution) James Kass (Tue Nov 27 2001 - 15:37:26 EST)
• Re: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution) Asmus Freytag (Wed Nov 28 2001 - 02:31:59 EST)
• Re: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution) James Kass (Wed Nov 28 2001 - 07:09:42 EST)
• Re: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution) James Kass (Wed Nov 28 2001 - 07:21:37 EST)
• RE: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution) Marco Cimarosti (Wed Nov 28 2001 - 06:32:37 EST)
• RE: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution) Marco Cimarosti (Wed Nov 28 2001 - 06:14:42 EST)
• RE: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution) John Hudson (Wed Nov 28 2001 - 08:31:51 EST)
• Re: RE: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution) Dhrubajyoti Banerjee (Wed Nov 28 2001 - 13:47:33 EST)
• RE: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution) John Hudson (Wed Nov 28 2001 - 08:54:02 EST)
• RE: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution) Michael Everson (Wed Nov 28 2001 - 08:24:04 EST)
• E-mail addresses for Viet-Std and TriChlor DougEwell2@cs.com (Wed Nov 28 2001 - 09:53:34 EST)
• RE: RE: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution) Marco Cimarosti (Wed Nov 28 2001 - 11:05:32 EST)
• RE: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution) Marco Cimarosti (Wed Nov 28 2001 - 11:19:13 EST)
• RE: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution) pani@vsnl.net (Wed Nov 28 2001 - 11:23:38 EST)
• RE: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution) Marco Cimarosti (Wed Nov 28 2001 - 12:11:11 EST)
• FW: Query !! Magda Danish (Unicode) (Wed Nov 28 2001 - 13:28:44 EST)
• FW: Web Globalization and Unicode Experts to Meet in Washington, D.C. Misha.Wolf@reuters.com (Wed Nov 28 2001 - 15:08:46 EST)
• Re: FW: Query !! Jungshik Shin (Wed Nov 28 2001 - 15:25:13 EST)
• RE: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution) Asmus Freytag (Wed Nov 28 2001 - 16:26:10 EST)
• Re: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution) Asmus Freytag (Wed Nov 28 2001 - 16:21:09 EST)
• RE: Indic editing (was: RE: The real solution) Jungshik Shin (Wed Nov 28 2001 - 16:39:37 EST)
• Planning a "Unicode Only" Week Daniel Yacob (Wed Nov 28 2001 - 17:03:11 EST)
• Re: Planning a "Unicode Only" Week juuichiketajin@ranmamail.com (Wed Nov 28 2001 - 18:00:53 EST)
• RE: Planning a "Unicode Only" Week Christopher J Fynn (Wed Nov 28 2001 - 22:52:27 EST)
• Comments on FCD 5218, "Codes for the representation of human sexes" J M Sykes (Thu Nov 29 2001 - 05:16:20 EST)
• Re: Comments on FCD 5218, "Codes for the representation of human sexes" Otto Stolz (Thu Nov 29 2001 - 07:43:00 EST)
• RE: Planning a "Unicode Only" Week Suzanne M. Topping (Thu Nov 29 2001 - 10:37:00 EST)
• Re: Comments on FCD 5218, "Codes for the representation of human sexes" John Hudson (Thu Nov 29 2001 - 11:48:08 EST)
• Re: Comments on FCD 5218, "Codes for the representation of human sexes" Michael Everson (Thu Nov 29 2001 - 12:04:18 EST)
• Re: Comments on FCD 5218, "Codes for the representation of human sexes" DougEwell2@cs.com (Thu Nov 29 2001 - 12:28:50 EST)
• Re: Comments on FCD 5218, "Codes for the representation of human sexes" John Hudson (Thu Nov 29 2001 - 12:29:53 EST)
• Re: Comments on FCD 5218, "Codes for the representation of human sexes" John Hudson (Thu Nov 29 2001 - 12:33:16 EST)
• French uppercase accented letters (was: Re: Comments on FCD 5218) DougEwell2@cs.com (Thu Nov 29 2001 - 12:34:23 EST)
• Re: French uppercase accented letters (was: Re: Comments on FCD 5218) Alain LaBont� (Thu Nov 29 2001 - 14:13:56 EST)
• Re: Comments on FCD 5218, "Codes for the representation of human sexes" David Hopwood (Thu Nov 29 2001 - 14:55:24 EST)
• Re: French uppercase accented letters (was: Re: Comments on FCD 5218) Kenneth Whistler (Thu Nov 29 2001 - 15:33:32 EST)
• Re: French uppercase accented letters (was: Re: Comments on FCD 5218) Alain LaBont� (Thu Nov 29 2001 - 18:18:47 EST)
• RE: Planning a "Unicode Only" Week Martin Duerst (Thu Nov 29 2001 - 19:52:13 EST)
• Re: Comments on FCD 5218, "Codes for the representation of human sexes" Thierry Sourbier (Fri Nov 30 2001 - 04:12:24 EST)
• Re: French uppercase accented letters (was: Re: Comments on FCD 5218) Thierry Sourbier (Fri Nov 30 2001 - 04:17:53 EST)
• Re: French uppercase accented letters S�amas � Br�g�in (Fri Nov 30 2001 - 07:49:53 EST)
• Call for Papers - 21st Unicode Conference - May 2002 - Dublin Misha.Wolf@reuters.com (Fri Nov 30 2001 - 14:07:03 EST)
• Re: Call for Papers - 21st Unicode Conference - May 2002 - Dublin DougEwell2@cs.com (Fri Nov 30 2001 - 16:17:40 EST)
• Re: Comments on FCD 5218, "Codes for the representation of human sexes" Alain LaBont� (Fri Nov 30 2001 - 16:45:25 EST)
• Re: French uppercase accented letters (was: Re: Comments on FCD 5218) Alain LaBont� (Fri Nov 30 2001 - 16:51:06 EST)
• Re: French uppercase accented letters Alain LaBont� (Fri Nov 30 2001 - 17:22:37 EST)
• RE: French uppercase accented letters Etienne Kroger (Sat Dec 01 2001 - 00:33:48 EST)
• Re: Call for Papers - 21st Unicode Conference - May 2002 - Dublin Kenneth Whistler (Fri Nov 30 2001 - 21:43:38 EST)
• Re: Call for Papers - 21st Unicode Conference - May 2002 - Dublin James Kass (Fri Nov 30 2001 - 21:51:16 EST)
• RE: French uppercase accented letters John Hudson (Fri Nov 30 2001 - 22:14:17 EST)

Last message date: Fri Nov 30 2001 - 22:18:46 EST
Archived on: Fri Nov 30 2001 - 23:02:47 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Nov 30 2001 - 23:02:47 EST