No, they do work (worked for me with that site I put for Extension B.).
MichKa
Michael Kaplan
Trigeminal Software, Inc.
http://www.trigeminal.com/
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tex Texin" <texin@progress.com>
To: "Michael (michka) Kaplan" <michka@trigeminal.com>
Cc: "Unicoders" <unicode@unicode.org>
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2001 3:12 PM
Subject: Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo
>
> "Michael (michka) Kaplan" wrote:
> >
> > The instructions should work for XP.
> >
> > I would argue that it is up to the client, and the browser, to figure
out
> > how to display things. Isn't it? :-)
>
>
> Absolutely. I realize its not my personal responsibility to make the
> browsers display surrogates, it is their job. But when they don't behave
> properly, I think it is good management to apply some coaching (edited
> the registry), incentives (rebooted several times), and if needed, some
> discipline (I thru the monitor against the wall, but only once.)
>
> So sure, the browser should figure it out, but if someone had a few good
> coaching tips...
> ;-)
>
>
> OK, so I take it that is your way of saying surrogates aren't supported
> yet...
>
> tex
>
> --
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> Tex Texin Director, International Business
> mailto:Texin@Progress.com Tel: +1-781-280-4271
> the Progress Company Fax: +1-781-280-4655
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> For a compelling demonstration for Unicode:
> http://www.geocities.com/i18nguy/unicode-example.html
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sat Nov 17 2001 - 19:15:27 EST