Arjun Aggarwal wrote:
> >Moreover, the concept of <la = half la + danda> may be
> natural for people
> >who are used to typewriters and typography. Which is, some
> of the people
> >who are more likely to switch to computers.
>
> I fully agree with Mr. Marco Cimarosti in this regard.
>
> This is the point to which i really wanted everybody to focus
> on i.e. the problem of encoding as well as display .
Therefore, you don't fully agree with me.
My opinion is that the encoding is OK as it is in ISCII and Unicode. I take
in consideration "your" way of splitting the graphemes *only* at the editing
level.
_ Marco
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Dec 03 2001 - 09:56:57 EST