Re: Unicode vs Code pages

From: John Cowan (jcowan@reutershealth.com)
Date: Wed May 29 2002 - 14:39:08 EDT

Previous message: Theodore H. Smith: "How is UTF8, UTF16 and UTF32 encoded?"
In reply to: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Unicode vs Code pages"
Next in thread: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Unicode vs Code pages"
Next in thread: Stefan Persson: "Re: Unicode vs Code pages"
Reply: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Unicode vs Code pages"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

"Michael \(michka\) Kaplan" scripsit:

> 1) Many applications do not yet support Unicode, and those applications
> still need to work properly (imagine trying to sell an OS where your
> favorite apps would not install and run?).

But this does not apply to Windows CE, surely, where apps must be
at least recompiled if not rewritten altogether?

-- 
John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>     http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen,    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith.  --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_

Previous message: Theodore H. Smith: "How is UTF8, UTF16 and UTF32 encoded?"
In reply to: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Unicode vs Code pages"
Next in thread: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Unicode vs Code pages"
Next in thread: Stefan Persson: "Re: Unicode vs Code pages"
Reply: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Unicode vs Code pages"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Wed May 29 2002 - 12:57:41 EDT