From: John Cowan (jcowan@reutershealth.com)
Date: Tue May 06 2003 - 14:41:04 EDT
Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin scripsit:
> The same for U+0307, U+0310, U+0323, U+0324 and U+0344 (oops -- the
> latter is not canonical; speaking of which: why U+310 isn't decomposable
> as U+0306 U+0301?...)
It used to be, but when normalization came in, the concept of decomposable
non-spacing marks was abandoned.
-- John Cowan jcowan@reutershealth.com "You need a change: try Canada" "You need a change: try China" --fortune cookies opened by a couple that I know
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue May 06 2003 - 15:39:09 EDT