Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages?

From: Stefan Persson (alsjebegrijptwatikbedoel@yahoo.se)
Date: Thu May 22 2003 - 09:23:47 EDT

Next message: Peter_Constable@sil.org: "RE: marks in Modern Hebrew, Yiddish"

Previous message: Marco Cimarosti: "RE: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental language s?"
In reply to: John Cowan: "Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages?"
Next in thread: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages?"
Reply: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

John Cowan wrote:

> There are no less than 70K Han characters in Unicode 4.0.

And if you are quoting some old source, involving any character NOT in Unicode, you may map that character to any preferred PUA code point.

Stefan

Next message: Peter_Constable@sil.org: "RE: marks in Modern Hebrew, Yiddish"
Previous message: Marco Cimarosti: "RE: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental language s?"
In reply to: John Cowan: "Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages?"
Next in thread: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages?"
Reply: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu May 22 2003 - 10:30:05 EDT