Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages?

From: Ben Dougall (bend@freenet.co.uk)
Date: Thu May 22 2003 - 10:56:22 EDT

Next message: Paul Hastings: "javascript and unicode"

Previous message: Rick McGowan: "Re: CodePage Information"
In reply to: Theodore H. Smith: "Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages?"
Next in thread: Stefan Persson: "Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Thursday, May 22, 2003, at 01:51 pm, Theodore H. Smith wrote:

>> There are no less than 70K Han characters in Unicode 4.0.
>
> Thats quite a lot. Personally I'm glad I only have to know 26 (x2 for
> uppercase).

yeah, but just think of all the various combinations and sequences of
those 26 chars you have to know :)

Next message: Paul Hastings: "javascript and unicode"
Previous message: Rick McGowan: "Re: CodePage Information"
In reply to: Theodore H. Smith: "Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages?"
Next in thread: Stefan Persson: "Re: Is it true that Unicode is insufficient for Oriental languages?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu May 22 2003 - 12:43:10 EDT