Re: Fraktur yet again (was: Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?)

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Tue May 25 2004 - 08:45:19 CDT

Next message: Frank da Cruz: "Re: VISCII (was: Re: [BULK] - Re: MCW encoding of Hebrew)"

Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: Proposal to encode dominoes and other game symbols"
In reply to: Dean Snyder: "Re: Fraktur yet again (was: Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?)"
Next in thread: Dean Snyder: "Re: Fraktur yet again (was: Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?)"
Reply: Dean Snyder: "Re: Fraktur yet again (was: Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 09:06 -0400 2004-05-25, Dean Snyder wrote:
>Michael Everson wrote at 2:58 PM on Monday, May 24, 2004:
>
>>In any case we're encoding the significant nodes
>>in your *diascript. Similarly, Swedish, Bokmål,
>>Nynorsk, and Danish are distinguished, as are the
>>Romance languages.
>
>Are you saying that Swedish, Danish, and the
>Romance languages are not unified in Unicode?

Are you being deliberately obtuse?

-- 
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  * http://www.evertype.com

Next message: Frank da Cruz: "Re: VISCII (was: Re: [BULK] - Re: MCW encoding of Hebrew)"
Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: Proposal to encode dominoes and other game symbols"
In reply to: Dean Snyder: "Re: Fraktur yet again (was: Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?)"
Next in thread: Dean Snyder: "Re: Fraktur yet again (was: Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?)"
Reply: Dean Snyder: "Re: Fraktur yet again (was: Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue May 25 2004 - 08:45:54 CDT