Re: Finnegans Wake, was Re: comment on L2/06-215

From: Richard Cook (rscook@berkeley.edu)
Date: Sun Jun 25 2006 - 19:35:12 CDT

Next message: Richard Cook: "Re: Finnegans Wake, was Re: comment on L2/06-215"

Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: Finnegans Wake, was Re: comment on L2/06-215"
In reply to: Richard Cook: "Finnegans Wake, was Re: comment on L2/06-215"
Next in thread: Richard Cook: "Re: Finnegans Wake, was Re: comment on L2/06-215"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Jun 25, 2006, at 3:39 PM, Richard Cook wrote:

> On Jun 24, 2006, at 5:47 PM, Peter Constable wrote:
>
>> Regarding the name of the first of the three proposed letters,
>> shouldn’t that be TURNED E rather than INVERTED E?
> I don't know, but, what I want to know is, how much closer does
> this bring us to a Unicode _Finnegans Wake_? That book has a few
> variously rotated E's, the encoding status of which I've been
> vaguely thinking about checking.
>
> http://www.trentu.ca/jjoyce/
>
> But maybe Unicode's resident Irishman already knows the answer?

here, I just generated a list of pages with "sigla/" in the html:

Not only rotated E's, but F's etc.

-Richard

Next message: Richard Cook: "Re: Finnegans Wake, was Re: comment on L2/06-215"
Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: Finnegans Wake, was Re: comment on L2/06-215"
In reply to: Richard Cook: "Finnegans Wake, was Re: comment on L2/06-215"
Next in thread: Richard Cook: "Re: Finnegans Wake, was Re: comment on L2/06-215"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jun 25 2006 - 19:38:46 CDT