Re: [unicode] kJapaneseOn and kJapaneseKun Use What Romanization Standard?

From: Christoph Burgmer (cburgmer@ira.uka.de)
Date: Sun Jan 24 2010 - 16:27:12 CST

  • Next message: William J Poser: "Re: [unicode] kJapaneseOn and kJapaneseKun Use What Romanization Standard?"

    Am Sonntag, 24. Januar 2010 schrieb Ed Trager:
    > On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 2:01 PM, <mpsuzuki@hiroshima-u.ac.jp> wrote:
    > > Hi,
    > >
    > > It seems that different styles are mixed. I'm not sure
    > > Hepburn style is dominant or Kunrei style is dominant.
    >
    > ... Oh, that is not good ...
    >
    > So would I be correct to assume that I cannot automatically convert
    > the kJapaneseOn and kJapaneseKun fields from romanization into kana?
    > I was hoping that I could just write a quick tool in Perl or something
    > to map to hiragana ...

    Did you have a look at <http://www.csse.monash.edu.au/~jwb/kanjidic2/> ?
    Kanjidic has On and Kun readings in Kana.

    -Christoph

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jan 24 2010 - 16:30:03 CST