Re: [unicode] kJapaneseOn and kJapaneseKun Use What Romanization Standard?

From: Ed Trager (ed.trager@gmail.com)
Date: Sun Jan 24 2010 - 19:36:27 CST

  • Next message: mpsuzuki@hiroshima-u.ac.jp: "Re: [unicode] kJapaneseOn and kJapaneseKun Use What Romanization Standard?"

    Thanks, Christoph!

    >
    > Did you have a look at <http://www.csse.monash.edu.au/~jwb/kanjidic2/> ?
    > Kanjidic has On and Kun readings in Kana.
    >

    Yes, That's much more convenient!

    William Poser is correct in pointing out that I could probably do
    accurate conversion to kana from the romanization in Unihan. But why
    bother when kanjidic2 already has everything in Kana? Also it looks
    like kanjidic2 has a larger number of readings anyway.

    Best - Ed

    > -Christoph
    >

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jan 24 2010 - 19:41:24 CST