From: John H. Jenkins (email@example.com)
Date: Mon Jan 25 2010 - 11:32:45 CST
Yes, and it had the same problems that kJapanese* currently have: unknown provenance, relative paucity of data, and inconsistent romanization.
On Jan 25, 2010, at 9:08 AM, Christoph Burgmer wrote:
> Btw, the Korean reading was upgraded lately - it was only available in a
> romanization before, too, if I remember correctly.
John H. Jenkins
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jan 25 2010 - 11:40:36 CST