Re: Overloading Unicode

From: Doug Ewell (doug@ewellic.org)
Date: Sat Jun 05 2010 - 19:10:44 CDT

Next message: SS: "Re: Overloading Unicode"

Previous message: Αλέξανδρος Διαμαντίδης: "Tibetan question"
In reply to: Doug Ewell: "Re: Overloading Unicode"
Next in thread: Mark E. Shoulson: "Re: Overloading Unicode"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

I wrote:

> It is not discrimination, fair or unfair, if you submit a proposal for
> something that is not generally accepted to be in scope for the
> Standard, and the proposal is rejected on those grounds.

Well, of course, it would be "fair discrimination."

--
Doug Ewell  |  Thornton, Colorado, USA  |  http://www.ewellic.org
RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14  |  ietf-languages @ http://is.gd/2kf0s

Next message: SS: "Re: Overloading Unicode"
Previous message: Αλέξανδρος Διαμαντίδης: "Tibetan question"
In reply to: Doug Ewell: "Re: Overloading Unicode"
Next in thread: Mark E. Shoulson: "Re: Overloading Unicode"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Jun 05 2010 - 19:13:36 CDT