From: SS (email@example.com)
Date: Sat Jun 05 2010 - 19:29:27 CDT
There will need to be explanations for a scalable plan.
However, yes it is in use today, though not by the majority (yet).
ie, u and uu matras legation is in contemporary (majority) use.
Non legated u and uu are also in use, but by minority at present.
Also, non-legated use of u and uu were the norm before it was changed to
legated form in or arround 1700AD.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Doug Ewell" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: "Unicode Mailing List" <email@example.com>
Cc: "SS" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: 05 June 2010 17:35
Subject: Re: Overloading Unicode
> "SS" <sisrivas at blueyonder dot co dot uk> wrote:
>> To the point, There are usage samples, there were/are
>> publications/magazines even run by the then leader of the current chief
>> minister of Tamil Nadu state.
>> There are usage samples. Widespread!, this will be done eventually as
>> with other rollbacks of the past, in a controlled manner.
> Is this something that is proposed for the future, or it something that
> has already been adopted now or is scheduled for adoption by a
> siginificant proportion of Tamil speakers? Can I find out about it in
> newspapers or periodicals, or Internet locations, other than those
> controlled by the group(s) promoting the reform?
> Note that the question is not "Is this a desirable reform?" nor "Will this
> reform make the Tamil language easier to read and write?"
> Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA | http://www.ewellic.org
> RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14 | ietf-languages @ http://is.gd/2kf0s
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Jun 05 2010 - 19:32:18 CDT