From: Erkki I Kolehmainen (eik@iki.fi)
Date: Sun Jun 27 2010 - 16:39:09 CDT
As it has been pointed out, the unreliability of the euro sign is with the 8859-15 encoding, whereas it works extremely reliably with UCS/Unicode. And so would any other sign.
Erkki I. Kolehmainen
-----Alkuperäinen viesti-----
Lähettäjä: unicode-bounce@unicode.org [mailto:unicode-bounce@unicode.org] Puolesta Tulasi
Lähetetty: 27. kesäkuuta 2010 23:46
Vastaanottaja: Unicode Discussion
Kopio: Mark Davis ☕
Aihe: Re: Indian Rupee Sign to be chosen today
> Even in the year 2010, the euro sign (¤) doesn't work reliably.
He calls it brain-dead :-')
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Andreas Prilop <prilop4...@trashmail.net>
Date: 25 June, 07:54
Subject: Indian Rupee Sign to be chosen today
To: de.test
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010, I wrote
> Even in the year 2010, the euro sign (¤) doesn't work reliably.
in both the Unicode list and in the newsgroup de.test.
unicode.org shows a euro sign:http://www.unicode.org/mail-arch/unicode-
ml/y2010-m06/0372.html
groups.google.com shows a currency sign:http://groups.google.co.uk/
group/de.test/msg/e027e91e7ef17f62
Mark Davis called this an "algorithm" inhttp://www.unicode.org/mail-arch/unicode-ml/y2010-m01/0273.html
I call it brain-dead.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jun 27 2010 - 16:41:23 CDT