MichKa,
> Also, Toby was not attempting to be deceitful, AFAIK. The
> original proposal
> he submitted (still called UTF-8S) was not in any way
> contradictory but many
> people objected to various issues within it and the way many things were
> presented. The current proposal was a very rushed attempt to
> respond to the
> feedback.
That is good news I had hoped the it did not come for Peoplesoft. However,
if a characters set called CESU-8 is registers with IANA then it is really
irreverent if it is an internal protocol.
Carl
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Sep 17 2001 - 12:40:57 EDT