Re: Unicode and end users

From: David Starner (starner@okstate.edu)
Date: Thu Feb 14 2002 - 15:16:00 EST

Previous message: David Starner: "Re: This spoofing and security thread"
In reply to: Keld J�rn Simonsen: "Re: Unicode and end users"
Next in thread: Michael Everson: "Re: Unicode and end users"
Reply: Michael Everson: "Re: Unicode and end users"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 05:46:46PM +0100, Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
> I would rather recommend that you write ISO 10646 UTF-8 as the
> ISO standard is a standard in many countries while Unicode is not.

*Grumble*. The whole point of this discussion is making it clear for the
users. Unicode is more clear for more users than ISO 10646 is. There is
no reason to use ISO 10646, besides pedanticness.

-- 
David Starner / Давид Старнэр - starner@okstate.edu
Pointless website: http://dvdeug.dhis.org
What we've got is a blue-light special on truth. It's the hottest thing 
with the youth. -- Information Society, "Peace and Love, Inc."

Previous message: David Starner: "Re: This spoofing and security thread"
In reply to: Keld J�rn Simonsen: "Re: Unicode and end users"
Next in thread: Michael Everson: "Re: Unicode and end users"
Reply: Michael Everson: "Re: Unicode and end users"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Thu Feb 14 2002 - 14:53:26 EST