Re: Unicode and end users

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Thu Feb 14 2002 - 15:40:32 EST

Previous message: David Starner: "Re: Unicode and end users"
In reply to: David Starner: "Re: Unicode and end users"
Next in thread: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Unicode and end users"
Reply: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Unicode and end users"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 14:16 -0600 2002-02-14, David Starner wrote:
>
>The whole point of this discussion is making it clear for the
>users. Unicode is more clear for more users than ISO 10646 is. There is
>no reason to use ISO 10646, besides pedanticness.

It is ISO/IEC 10646.

-- 
Michael Everson *** Everson Typography *** http://www.evertype.com

Previous message: David Starner: "Re: Unicode and end users"
In reply to: David Starner: "Re: Unicode and end users"
Next in thread: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Unicode and end users"
Reply: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Unicode and end users"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Thu Feb 14 2002 - 15:26:31 EST