Re: Unicode and end users

From: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (michka@trigeminal.com)
Date: Thu Feb 14 2002 - 16:13:19 EST

Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: Unicode and end users"
In reply to: Michael Everson: "Re: Unicode and end users"
Next in thread: David Hopwood: "Re: Unicode and end users"
Next in thread: Asmus Freytag: "Re: Unicode and end users"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

From: "Michael Everson" <everson@evertype.com>
> At 14:16 -0600 2002-02-14, David Starner wrote:

> There is no reason to use ISO 10646, besides pedanticness.

> It is ISO/IEC 10646.

The defense rests.

MichKa

Michael Kaplan
Trigeminal Software, Inc. -- http://www.trigeminal.com/

Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: Unicode and end users"
In reply to: Michael Everson: "Re: Unicode and end users"
Next in thread: David Hopwood: "Re: Unicode and end users"
Next in thread: Asmus Freytag: "Re: Unicode and end users"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Thu Feb 14 2002 - 15:48:57 EST