From: Mike (mike-list@pobox.com)
Date: Fri Oct 26 2007 - 09:13:29 CDT
> I am certain that what was meant was, "If the allocation of CJKV code
> points continues to be done in this way, then modern CJKV coverage will
> require not only BMP and plane 2 support but also, in the future, plane
> 3 support."
I'm uncertain as to what the problem being discussed is. Once you have
support for plane 2, you automatically support plane 3 (and planes 4, 5,
6, etc.) at least from an encoding perspective (UTF-xx). What am I
missing?
Mike
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Oct 26 2007 - 09:14:51 CDT