Re: Gwoyeu Romatzyh marking the optional neutral tone

From: Christoph Burgmer (cburgmer@ira.uka.de)
Date: Tue Jul 14 2009 - 16:44:47 CDT

  • Next message: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Gwoyeu Romatzyh marking the optional neutral tone"

    Am Dienstag, 14. Juli 2009 schrieb Asmus Freytag:
    > On 7/14/2009 8:16 AM, Christoph Burgmer wrote:
    > > Am Dienstag, 14. Juli 2009 schrieb Michael Everson:
    > >> On 14 Jul 2009, at 15:27, Christoph Burgmer wrote:
    > >>> http://www.stud.uni-karlsruhe.de/~uyhc/files/images/p1070462.jpg
    > >>> http://www.stud.uni-karlsruhe.de/~uyhc/files/images/p1070465.jpg
    > >>>
    > >>> For me that is clearly a different glyph.
    > >>
    > >> Different from what? To me, it's a zero or an o. It's not a ring since
    > >> those are typically monoline.
    > >
    > > Yes, different from the three initially posted examples.
    >
    > I agree.
    >
    > What about the other subscripted characters from the first example - it
    > would be nice to see them in the second source, if they occur there. Are
    > they primes, vertical bars or subscripted digits "1"?
    >
    > A./

    They look pretty similar to the other ones, but clearly handwritten, as it was
    already mentioned for the Chinese characters:

    http://www.stud.uni-karlsruhe.de/~uyhc/files/images/p1070466.jpg

    -Christoph

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jul 14 2009 - 16:45:38 CDT