Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo

From: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (michka@trigeminal.com)
Date: Sat Nov 17 2001 - 18:17:04 EST


When I did have this working, I had the config as shown at the following
site; further respondent sayeth naught:

http://www.i18nwithvb.com/surrogate_ime/code_charts/

I was at that time running Win2000 SP2, IE 5.5, and a version of WEFT.

MichKa

Michael Kaplan
Trigeminal Software, Inc.
http://www.trigeminal.com/

----- Original Message -----
From: "James Kass" <jameskass@worldnet.att.net>
To: "Michael (michka) Kaplan" <michka@trigeminal.com>; "Tex Texin"
<texin@progress.com>; "Unicoders" <unicode@unicode.org>
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2001 3:59 PM
Subject: Re: Unicode surrogates in browsers for the compelling demo

> Michael Kaplan wrote,
>
>
>
> > The instructions should work for XP.
> >
> > I would argue that it is up to the client, and the browser, to figure
out
> > how to display things. Isn't it? :-)
> >
>
> It is. But, perhaps Tex Texin is anticipating that if he puts data
> in the web page which displays as little boxes, he'll be deluged
> with letters concerning display issues.
>
> Still haven't been able to display non-BMP text in MSIE on W2K here.
> Finally checked the version number of MSIE, it's 5.00.xxxxx.
> Do I need a newer browser for supplementary ranges? The
> USP10.DLL file is dated 07-26-2000. Newer Uniscribe?
>
> Best regards,
>
> James Kass.
>
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sat Nov 17 2001 - 19:08:57 EST