Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?

From: Andrew West via Unicode <unicode_at_unicode.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 09:39:11 +0000

On 19 January 2018 at 09:16, Shriramana Sharma via Unicode
<unicode_at_unicode.org> wrote:
> Wow. Somebody really needs to convey this to the Kazhaks. Else a
> short-sighted decision would ruin their chances at native IDNs. Any Kazhaks
> on this list?

There's only one Kazakh who counts, and I'm pretty sure he's not on this list.

Andrew
Received on Fri Jan 19 2018 - 03:39:53 CST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Michael Everson via Unicode: "Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?"
Previous message: Shriramana Sharma via Unicode: "Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?"
In reply to: Shriramana Sharma via Unicode: "Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?"
Next in thread: Michael Everson via Unicode: "Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?"
Reply: Michael Everson via Unicode: "Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Jan 19 2018 - 03:39:53 CST