Unicode Mail List Archive: by author

=?utf-8?Q? J.=C2=A0S._Choi ?= via Unicode
- W3C discussion: nullifying BCP47 tags for emoji presentation in HTML/XML (Wed Jan 03 2018 - 11:15:39 CST)
Alastair Houghton via Unicode
- Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) (Tue Jan 30 2018 - 04:20:46 CST)
Aleksey Tulinov via Unicode
- Re: Emoji for major planets at least? (Thu Jan 18 2018 - 18:19:14 CST)
Andre Schappo via Unicode
- Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises (Mon Jan 29 2018 - 07:03:38 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Fri Jan 26 2018 - 03:08:51 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Fri Jan 26 2018 - 02:25:10 CST)
- Internationalization & Unicode Conference 2018 (Wed Jan 24 2018 - 07:27:04 CST)
- Internationalised Computer Science Exercises (Mon Jan 22 2018 - 10:39:57 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Thu Jan 18 2018 - 09:38:06 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Thu Jan 18 2018 - 05:00:35 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Thu Jan 18 2018 - 02:21:27 CST)
Andrew West via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Thu Jan 25 2018 - 06:15:18 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Fri Jan 19 2018 - 07:51:43 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Fri Jan 19 2018 - 03:39:11 CST)
announcements_at_unicode.org
- IUC 42 Call for Participation Announced! (Wed Jan 31 2018 - 17:05:57 CST)
- Unicode LDML Keyboard Enhancements (Fri Jan 05 2018 - 14:05:19 CST)
Anshuman Pandey via Unicode
- Re: Emoji for major planets at least? (Thu Jan 18 2018 - 13:04:09 CST)
Asmus Freytag \(c\) via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Fri Jan 19 2018 - 14:10:33 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Fri Jan 19 2018 - 14:08:23 CST)
- Re: Emoji for major planets at least? (Thu Jan 18 2018 - 12:46:24 CST)
Asmus Freytag via Unicode
- Re: Emoji for major planets at least? (Thu Jan 18 2018 - 17:25:02 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Thu Jan 18 2018 - 12:51:39 CST)
- Re: Emoji for major planets at least? (Thu Jan 18 2018 - 11:44:05 CST)
- Re: Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10) (Tue Jan 02 2018 - 03:21:37 CST)
Christoph Päper via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Tue Jan 23 2018 - 09:18:11 CST)
- Re: Emoji for major planets at least? (Fri Jan 19 2018 - 08:16:05 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Wed Jan 17 2018 - 16:11:09 CST)
- Re: Emoji’s (Thu Jan 11 2018 - 05:30:39 CST)
David Melik via Unicode
- Re: superscripts & subscripts for science/mathematics? (Mon Jan 22 2018 - 21:43:34 CST)
- superscripts & subscripts for science/mathematics? (Sun Jan 21 2018 - 00:15:35 CST)
- superscripts & subscripts for science/mathematics? (Sun Jan 21 2018 - 00:14:15 CST)
David Starner via Unicode
- Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) (Tue Jan 30 2018 - 17:30:59 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Wed Jan 24 2018 - 20:49:24 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Tue Jan 23 2018 - 13:35:51 CST)
Denis Jacquerye via Unicode
- In the mean time, in France (was Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) (Sat Jan 27 2018 - 04:22:22 CST)
Doug Ewell via Unicode
- RE: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (Tue Jan 30 2018 - 12:50:49 CST)
- Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (Tue Jan 30 2018 - 12:34:40 CST)
- RE: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) (Mon Jan 29 2018 - 20:08:55 CST)
- RE: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) (Mon Jan 29 2018 - 17:07:11 CST)
- Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) (Sun Jan 28 2018 - 17:20:16 CST)
- Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) (Sun Jan 28 2018 - 15:11:06 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Thu Jan 25 2018 - 13:34:16 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Thu Jan 25 2018 - 08:14:46 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Wed Jan 24 2018 - 16:19:07 CST)
- RE: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Tue Jan 23 2018 - 16:24:05 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Tue Jan 23 2018 - 12:51:42 CST)
- SignWriting in U+40000 block (Mon Jan 22 2018 - 10:28:58 CST)
- Re: Non-RGI sequences are not emoji? (was: Re: Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10)) (Mon Jan 15 2018 - 21:57:13 CST)
- Non-RGI sequences are not emoji? (was: Re: Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10)) (Tue Jan 02 2018 - 14:55:47 CST)
Eric Muller via Unicode
- Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (Tue Jan 30 2018 - 07:15:16 CST)
- 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Mon Jan 15 2018 - 21:25:01 CST)
Frédéric Grosshans via Unicode
- Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises (Mon Jan 22 2018 - 11:55:16 CST)
Henri Sivonen via Unicode
- PDF restrictions on the Unicode Standard 10.0 (Sat Jan 13 2018 - 11:14:13 CST)
James Kass via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Tue Jan 23 2018 - 13:33:49 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Tue Jan 23 2018 - 00:45:29 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Mon Jan 22 2018 - 22:31:57 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Mon Jan 22 2018 - 18:55:45 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Sat Jan 20 2018 - 00:45:18 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Fri Jan 19 2018 - 20:59:53 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Tue Jan 16 2018 - 01:40:15 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Mon Jan 15 2018 - 22:16:21 CST)
Janusz S. Bień via Unicode
- Re: TIRONIAN SIGN ET (Sun Jan 28 2018 - 01:23:15 CST)
- Re: TIRONIAN SIGN ET (Sat Jan 27 2018 - 14:17:18 CST)
- TIRONIAN SIGN ET (Sat Jan 27 2018 - 13:40:49 CST)
jillian mestel via Unicode
- Emoji’s (Wed Jan 10 2018 - 21:44:25 CST)
John H. Jenkins via Unicode
- Re: Support for Extension F (Wed Jan 31 2018 - 11:25:22 CST)
- Re: Emoji for major planets at least? (Thu Jan 18 2018 - 12:01:43 CST)
John W Kennedy via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Fri Jan 26 2018 - 15:14:22 CST)
Jonathan Rosenne via Unicode
- RE: Popular wordprocessors treating U+00A0 as fixed-width (Mon Jan 01 2018 - 02:06:27 CST)
Julian Bradfield via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Sat Jan 27 2018 - 03:29:03 CST)
Karl Sanders via Unicode
- Whitespace-related characters (Tue Jan 09 2018 - 21:44:28 CST)
Khaled Hosny via Unicode
- Re: superscripts & subscripts for science/mathematics? (Tue Jan 23 2018 - 05:51:17 CST)
Manish Goregaokar via Unicode
- Re: Emoji’s (Thu Jan 11 2018 - 22:53:26 CST)
- Re: Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10) (Tue Jan 02 2018 - 03:41:48 CST)
- Re: Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10) (Tue Jan 02 2018 - 03:32:27 CST)
- Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10) (Mon Jan 01 2018 - 01:54:29 CST)
Marcel Schneider via Unicode
- Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (Wed Jan 31 2018 - 16:44:05 CST)
- Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) (Tue Jan 30 2018 - 22:39:00 CST)
- Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (Tue Jan 30 2018 - 15:24:23 CST)
- RE: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (Tue Jan 30 2018 - 14:06:06 CST)
- Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (Tue Jan 30 2018 - 13:42:02 CST)
- Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (Tue Jan 30 2018 - 13:09:31 CST)
- Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (Tue Jan 30 2018 - 11:55:46 CST)
- Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) (Mon Jan 29 2018 - 23:31:34 CST)
- RE: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) (Mon Jan 29 2018 - 23:09:10 CST)
- Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (Mon Jan 29 2018 - 06:38:48 CST)
- Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) (Mon Jan 29 2018 - 05:26:01 CST)
- Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) (Sun Jan 28 2018 - 21:55:22 CST)
- Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (Sun Jan 28 2018 - 20:17:34 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Sun Jan 28 2018 - 01:12:45 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Sat Jan 27 2018 - 15:54:57 CST)
Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode
- Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) (Sun Jan 28 2018 - 23:56:25 CST)
- Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) (Sun Jan 28 2018 - 17:04:37 CST)
- Re: [HUMOR] Proof that emojis are useful (Sat Jan 27 2018 - 11:45:30 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Thu Jan 25 2018 - 12:48:59 CST)
- Re: Proposed Expansion of Grapheme Clusters to Whole Aksharas - Implementation Issues (Mon Jan 22 2018 - 21:34:38 CST)
- Re: Proposed Expansion of Grapheme Clusters to Whole Aksharas - Implementation Issues (Mon Jan 22 2018 - 00:34:12 CST)
- Re: Non-RGI sequences are not emoji? (was: Re: Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10)) (Fri Jan 05 2018 - 05:30:55 CST)
- Re: Regex for Grapheme Cluster Breaks (Wed Jan 03 2018 - 04:38:17 CST)
- Regex for Grapheme Cluster Breaks (Wed Jan 03 2018 - 03:16:36 CST)
- Re: Non-RGI sequences are not emoji? (was: Re: Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10)) (Wed Jan 03 2018 - 02:29:14 CST)
- Re: Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10) (Tue Jan 02 2018 - 04:52:27 CST)
- Re: Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10) (Tue Jan 02 2018 - 04:41:16 CST)
- Re: Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10) (Tue Jan 02 2018 - 04:37:30 CST)
- Re: Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10) (Mon Jan 01 2018 - 09:47:59 CST)
Mark E. Shoulson via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Wed Jan 24 2018 - 21:27:34 CST)
- Observations and rants (Wed Jan 17 2018 - 20:30:57 CST)
Markus Scherer via Unicode
- Re: Internationalization & Unicode Conference 2018 (Wed Jan 24 2018 - 10:11:25 CST)
Martin J. Dürst via Unicode
- Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (Tue Jan 30 2018 - 02:06:52 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Mon Jan 22 2018 - 19:52:05 CST)
Michael Everson via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Fri Jan 19 2018 - 08:23:29 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Fri Jan 19 2018 - 07:47:43 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Fri Jan 19 2018 - 07:19:53 CST)
Paul Hackett via Unicode
- Re: Support for Extension F (Wed Jan 31 2018 - 12:26:51 CST)
Paul Hoffman via Unicode
- Re: Printed versions of Unicode v1 through v4 available (Sun Jan 07 2018 - 19:19:21 CST)
- Printed versions of Unicode v1 through v4 available (Sat Jan 06 2018 - 18:08:45 CST)
Phake Nick via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Tue Jan 23 2018 - 13:22:37 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Sun Jan 21 2018 - 21:35:16 CST)
philip chastney via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Wed Jan 24 2018 - 03:45:03 CST)
- Re: superscripts & subscripts for science/mathematics? (Tue Jan 23 2018 - 08:23:54 CST)
Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (Wed Jan 31 2018 - 17:30:45 CST)
- Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) (Wed Jan 31 2018 - 13:26:42 CST)
- Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises (Wed Jan 31 2018 - 12:45:56 CST)
- Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (Wed Jan 31 2018 - 12:05:17 CST)
- Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) (Tue Jan 30 2018 - 01:18:49 CST)
- Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises (Mon Jan 29 2018 - 07:15:04 CST)
- Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises (Mon Jan 29 2018 - 01:54:29 CST)
- Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises (Mon Jan 29 2018 - 00:37:46 CST)
- Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises (Mon Jan 29 2018 - 00:16:04 CST)
- Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises (Sun Jan 28 2018 - 13:45:36 CST)
- Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises (Sun Jan 28 2018 - 13:30:44 CST)
- Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises (Sun Jan 28 2018 - 13:29:28 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Thu Jan 25 2018 - 09:48:42 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Thu Jan 25 2018 - 09:40:44 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Wed Jan 24 2018 - 21:41:02 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Wed Jan 24 2018 - 21:30:52 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Wed Jan 24 2018 - 17:55:34 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Tue Jan 23 2018 - 14:53:25 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Tue Jan 23 2018 - 11:58:12 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Sun Jan 21 2018 - 06:49:46 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Fri Jan 19 2018 - 18:41:54 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Fri Jan 19 2018 - 07:56:48 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Fri Jan 19 2018 - 07:51:35 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Fri Jan 19 2018 - 07:42:52 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Fri Jan 19 2018 - 07:37:40 CST)
- Re: Emoji for major planets at least? (Thu Jan 18 2018 - 15:10:46 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Wed Jan 17 2018 - 07:06:26 CST)
- Re: Emoji’s (Thu Jan 11 2018 - 03:56:06 CST)
- Re: Printed versions of Unicode v1 through v4 available (Sun Jan 07 2018 - 18:32:47 CST)
- Re: Popular wordprocessors treating U+00A0 as fixed-width (Mon Jan 01 2018 - 04:32:47 CST)
Pierpaolo Bernardi via Unicode
- Re: Emoji for major planets at least? (Thu Jan 18 2018 - 19:12:04 CST)
- Re: Emoji’s (Thu Jan 11 2018 - 04:07:23 CST)
- Re: Emoji’s (Wed Jan 10 2018 - 23:35:01 CST)
Pravin Jain via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Mon Jan 15 2018 - 23:55:32 CST)
Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises (Wed Jan 31 2018 - 19:38:58 CST)
- Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises (Mon Jan 29 2018 - 14:53:05 CST)
- Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises (Mon Jan 29 2018 - 02:57:41 CST)
- Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises (Sun Jan 28 2018 - 16:44:56 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Sat Jan 27 2018 - 23:02:47 CST)
- Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises (Sat Jan 27 2018 - 22:12:30 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Fri Jan 26 2018 - 10:47:49 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Thu Jan 25 2018 - 00:51:33 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Tue Jan 23 2018 - 19:28:54 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Tue Jan 23 2018 - 15:52:46 CST)
- Re: Proposed Expansion of Grapheme Clusters to Whole Aksharas - Implementation Issues (Mon Jan 22 2018 - 21:06:04 CST)
- Re: Proposed Expansion of Grapheme Clusters to Whole Aksharas - Implementation Issues (Mon Jan 22 2018 - 20:41:00 CST)
- Re: Proposed Expansion of Grapheme Clusters to Whole Aksharas - Implementation Issues (Mon Jan 22 2018 - 20:34:29 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Mon Jan 22 2018 - 17:26:38 CST)
- Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises (Mon Jan 22 2018 - 17:02:42 CST)
- Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises (Mon Jan 22 2018 - 16:08:55 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Sun Jan 21 2018 - 12:49:45 CST)
- Re: Emoji for major planets at least? (Fri Jan 19 2018 - 02:42:44 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Tue Jan 16 2018 - 02:46:19 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Tue Jan 16 2018 - 02:00:19 CST)
- Re: Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10) (Tue Jan 02 2018 - 14:30:34 CST)
- Re: Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10) (Mon Jan 01 2018 - 08:52:20 CST)
Rick McGowan via Unicode
- Re: TIRONIAN SIGN ET (Sat Jan 27 2018 - 13:53:08 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Fri Jan 19 2018 - 10:42:07 CST)
Sarasvati via Unicode
- CLDR Keyboard and Layout discussion (Wed Jan 31 2018 - 17:50:51 CST)
Shervin Afshar via Unicode
- Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises (Sat Jan 27 2018 - 16:13:40 CST)
Shriramana Sharma via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Fri Jan 26 2018 - 02:49:55 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Wed Jan 24 2018 - 20:29:11 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Wed Jan 24 2018 - 20:29:08 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Fri Jan 19 2018 - 22:24:04 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Fri Jan 19 2018 - 07:35:23 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Fri Jan 19 2018 - 03:16:25 CST)
- Emoji for major planets at least? (Thu Jan 18 2018 - 08:55:52 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Tue Jan 16 2018 - 02:10:19 CST)
Simon Montagu via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? (Sat Jan 20 2018 - 14:04:49 CST)
Stephane Bortzmeyer via Unicode
- [HUMOR] Proof that emojis are useful (Sat Jan 27 2018 - 09:31:56 CST)
Tom Gewecke via Unicode
- Re: Support for Extension F (Wed Jan 31 2018 - 11:51:04 CST)
- Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) (Tue Jan 30 2018 - 09:54:19 CST)
- Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) (Mon Jan 29 2018 - 12:13:21 CST)
via Unicode
- Support for Extension F (Mon Jan 29 2018 - 23:26:54 CST)
Walter Tross via Unicode
- Re: Emoji for major planets at least? (Thu Jan 18 2018 - 15:59:12 CST)

Unicode Mail List Archive by author