Unicode Mail List Archive: by date

Monday, 1 January
- Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10) Manish Goregaokar via Unicode
- RE: Popular wordprocessors treating U+00A0 as fixed-width Jonathan Rosenne via Unicode
- Re: Popular wordprocessors treating U+00A0 as fixed-width Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10) Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Re: Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10) Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode
Tuesday, 2 January
- Re: Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10) Asmus Freytag via Unicode
- Re: Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10) Manish Goregaokar via Unicode
- Re: Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10) Manish Goregaokar via Unicode
- Re: Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10) Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode
- Re: Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10) Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode
- Re: Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10) Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode
- Re: Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10) Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Non-RGI sequences are not emoji? (was: Re: Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10)) Doug Ewell via Unicode
Wednesday, 3 January
- Re: Non-RGI sequences are not emoji? (was: Re: Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10)) Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode
- Regex for Grapheme Cluster Breaks Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode
- Re: Regex for Grapheme Cluster Breaks Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode
- W3C discussion: nullifying BCP47 tags for emoji presentation in HTML/XML =?utf-8?Q? J.=C2=A0S._Choi ?= via Unicode
Friday, 5 January
- Re: Non-RGI sequences are not emoji? (was: Re: Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10)) Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode
- Unicode LDML Keyboard Enhancements announcements_at_unicode.org
Saturday, 6 January
- Printed versions of Unicode v1 through v4 available Paul Hoffman via Unicode
Sunday, 7 January
- Re: Printed versions of Unicode v1 through v4 available Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: Printed versions of Unicode v1 through v4 available Paul Hoffman via Unicode
Tuesday, 9 January
- Whitespace-related characters Karl Sanders via Unicode
Wednesday, 10 January
- Emoji’s jillian mestel via Unicode
- Re: Emoji’s Pierpaolo Bernardi via Unicode
Thursday, 11 January
- Re: Emoji’s Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: Emoji’s Pierpaolo Bernardi via Unicode
- Re: Emoji’s Christoph Päper via Unicode
- Re: Emoji’s Manish Goregaokar via Unicode
Saturday, 13 January
- PDF restrictions on the Unicode Standard 10.0 Henri Sivonen via Unicode
Monday, 15 January
- 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Eric Muller via Unicode
- Re: Non-RGI sequences are not emoji? (was: Re: Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10)) Doug Ewell via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? James Kass via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Pravin Jain via Unicode
Tuesday, 16 January
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? James Kass via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Shriramana Sharma via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Richard Wordingham via Unicode
Wednesday, 17 January
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Christoph Päper via Unicode
- Observations and rants Mark E. Shoulson via Unicode
Thursday, 18 January
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Andre Schappo via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Andre Schappo via Unicode
- Emoji for major planets at least? Shriramana Sharma via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Andre Schappo via Unicode
- Re: Emoji for major planets at least? Asmus Freytag via Unicode
- Re: Emoji for major planets at least? John H. Jenkins via Unicode
- Re: Emoji for major planets at least? Asmus Freytag \(c\) via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Asmus Freytag via Unicode
- Re: Emoji for major planets at least? Anshuman Pandey via Unicode
- Re: Emoji for major planets at least? Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: Emoji for major planets at least? Walter Tross via Unicode
- Re: Emoji for major planets at least? Asmus Freytag via Unicode
- Re: Emoji for major planets at least? Aleksey Tulinov via Unicode
- Re: Emoji for major planets at least? Pierpaolo Bernardi via Unicode
Friday, 19 January
- Re: Emoji for major planets at least? Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Shriramana Sharma via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Andrew West via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Michael Everson via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Shriramana Sharma via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Michael Everson via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Andrew West via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: Emoji for major planets at least? Christoph Päper via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Michael Everson via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Rick McGowan via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Asmus Freytag \(c\) via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Asmus Freytag \(c\) via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? James Kass via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Shriramana Sharma via Unicode
Saturday, 20 January
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? James Kass via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Simon Montagu via Unicode
Sunday, 21 January
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- superscripts & subscripts for science/mathematics? David Melik via Unicode
- superscripts & subscripts for science/mathematics? David Melik via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Phake Nick via Unicode
Monday, 22 January
- Re: Proposed Expansion of Grapheme Clusters to Whole Aksharas - Implementation Issues Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode
- SignWriting in U+40000 block Doug Ewell via Unicode
- Internationalised Computer Science Exercises Andre Schappo via Unicode
- Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises Frédéric Grosshans via Unicode
- Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? James Kass via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Martin J. Dürst via Unicode
- Re: Proposed Expansion of Grapheme Clusters to Whole Aksharas - Implementation Issues Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Re: Proposed Expansion of Grapheme Clusters to Whole Aksharas - Implementation Issues Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Re: Proposed Expansion of Grapheme Clusters to Whole Aksharas - Implementation Issues Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Re: Proposed Expansion of Grapheme Clusters to Whole Aksharas - Implementation Issues Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode
- Re: superscripts & subscripts for science/mathematics? David Melik via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? James Kass via Unicode
Tuesday, 23 January
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? James Kass via Unicode
- Re: superscripts & subscripts for science/mathematics? Khaled Hosny via Unicode
- Re: superscripts & subscripts for science/mathematics? philip chastney via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Christoph Päper via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Doug Ewell via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Phake Nick via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? James Kass via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? David Starner via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- RE: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Doug Ewell via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Richard Wordingham via Unicode
Wednesday, 24 January
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? philip chastney via Unicode
- Internationalization & Unicode Conference 2018 Andre Schappo via Unicode
- Re: Internationalization & Unicode Conference 2018 Markus Scherer via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Doug Ewell via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Shriramana Sharma via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Shriramana Sharma via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? David Starner via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Mark E. Shoulson via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Philippe Verdy via Unicode
Thursday, 25 January
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Andrew West via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Doug Ewell via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Doug Ewell via Unicode
Friday, 26 January
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Andre Schappo via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Shriramana Sharma via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Andre Schappo via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? John W Kennedy via Unicode
Saturday, 27 January
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Julian Bradfield via Unicode
- In the mean time, in France (was Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) Denis Jacquerye via Unicode
- [HUMOR] Proof that emojis are useful Stephane Bortzmeyer via Unicode
- Re: [HUMOR] Proof that emojis are useful Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode
- TIRONIAN SIGN ET Janusz S. Bień via Unicode
- Re: TIRONIAN SIGN ET Rick McGowan via Unicode
- Re: TIRONIAN SIGN ET Janusz S. Bień via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Marcel Schneider via Unicode
- Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises Shervin Afshar via Unicode
- Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Richard Wordingham via Unicode
Sunday, 28 January
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Marcel Schneider via Unicode
- Re: TIRONIAN SIGN ET Janusz S. Bień via Unicode
- Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) Doug Ewell via Unicode
- Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode
- Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) Doug Ewell via Unicode
- Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR Marcel Schneider via Unicode
- Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) Marcel Schneider via Unicode
- Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode
Monday, 29 January
- Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) Marcel Schneider via Unicode
- Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR Marcel Schneider via Unicode
- Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises Andre Schappo via Unicode
- Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) Tom Gewecke via Unicode
- Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- RE: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) Doug Ewell via Unicode
- RE: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) Doug Ewell via Unicode
- RE: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) Marcel Schneider via Unicode
- Support for Extension F via Unicode
- Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) Marcel Schneider via Unicode
Tuesday, 30 January
- Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR Martin J. Dürst via Unicode
- Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) Alastair Houghton via Unicode
- Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR Eric Muller via Unicode
- Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) Tom Gewecke via Unicode
- Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR Marcel Schneider via Unicode
- Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR Doug Ewell via Unicode
- RE: Keyboard layouts and CLDR Doug Ewell via Unicode
- Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR Marcel Schneider via Unicode
- Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR Marcel Schneider via Unicode
- RE: Keyboard layouts and CLDR Marcel Schneider via Unicode
- Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR Marcel Schneider via Unicode
- Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) David Starner via Unicode
- Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) Marcel Schneider via Unicode
Wednesday, 31 January
- Re: Support for Extension F John H. Jenkins via Unicode
- Re: Support for Extension F Tom Gewecke via Unicode
- Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: Support for Extension F Paul Hackett via Unicode
- Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR Marcel Schneider via Unicode
- IUC 42 Call for Participation Announced! announcements_at_unicode.org
- Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- CLDR Keyboard and Layout discussion Sarasvati via Unicode
- Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises Richard Wordingham via Unicode

Last message date: Wed Jan 31 2018 - 19:39:30 CST
Archived on: Wed Jan 31 2018 - 19:39:30 CST

Unicode Mail List Archive by date