Unicode Mail List Archive: by thread

Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10) Manish Goregaokar via Unicode (Mon Jan 01 2018 - 01:54:29 CST)
- Re: Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10) Richard Wordingham via Unicode (Mon Jan 01 2018 - 08:52:20 CST)
  - Re: Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10) Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode (Mon Jan 01 2018 - 09:47:59 CST)
    - Re: Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10) Manish Goregaokar via Unicode (Tue Jan 02 2018 - 03:32:27 CST)
    - Re: Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10) Manish Goregaokar via Unicode (Tue Jan 02 2018 - 03:41:48 CST)
    - Re: Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10) Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode (Tue Jan 02 2018 - 04:41:16 CST)
    - Re: Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10) Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode (Tue Jan 02 2018 - 04:52:27 CST)
    - Re: Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10) Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode (Tue Jan 02 2018 - 04:37:30 CST)
  - Re: Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10) Asmus Freytag via Unicode (Tue Jan 02 2018 - 03:21:37 CST)
    - Re: Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10) Richard Wordingham via Unicode (Tue Jan 02 2018 - 14:30:34 CST)
RE: Popular wordprocessors treating U+00A0 as fixed-width Jonathan Rosenne via Unicode (Mon Jan 01 2018 - 02:06:27 CST)
- Re: Popular wordprocessors treating U+00A0 as fixed-width Philippe Verdy via Unicode (Mon Jan 01 2018 - 04:32:47 CST)
Non-RGI sequences are not emoji? (was: Re: Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10)) Doug Ewell via Unicode (Tue Jan 02 2018 - 14:55:47 CST)
- Re: Non-RGI sequences are not emoji? (was: Re: Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10)) Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode (Wed Jan 03 2018 - 02:29:14 CST)
  - Re: Non-RGI sequences are not emoji? (was: Re: Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10)) Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode (Fri Jan 05 2018 - 05:30:55 CST)
    - Re: Non-RGI sequences are not emoji? (was: Re: Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10)) Doug Ewell via Unicode (Mon Jan 15 2018 - 21:57:13 CST)
Regex for Grapheme Cluster Breaks Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode (Wed Jan 03 2018 - 03:16:36 CST)
- Re: Regex for Grapheme Cluster Breaks Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode (Wed Jan 03 2018 - 04:38:17 CST)
W3C discussion: nullifying BCP47 tags for emoji presentation in HTML/XML =?utf-8?Q? J.=C2=A0S._Choi ?= via Unicode (Wed Jan 03 2018 - 11:15:39 CST)
Unicode LDML Keyboard Enhancements announcements_at_unicode.org (Fri Jan 05 2018 - 14:05:19 CST)
Printed versions of Unicode v1 through v4 available Paul Hoffman via Unicode (Sat Jan 06 2018 - 18:08:45 CST)
- Re: Printed versions of Unicode v1 through v4 available Philippe Verdy via Unicode (Sun Jan 07 2018 - 18:32:47 CST)
  - Re: Printed versions of Unicode v1 through v4 available Paul Hoffman via Unicode (Sun Jan 07 2018 - 19:19:21 CST)
Whitespace-related characters Karl Sanders via Unicode (Tue Jan 09 2018 - 21:44:28 CST)
Emoji’s jillian mestel via Unicode (Wed Jan 10 2018 - 21:44:25 CST)
- Re: Emoji’s Pierpaolo Bernardi via Unicode (Wed Jan 10 2018 - 23:35:01 CST)
  - Re: Emoji’s Philippe Verdy via Unicode (Thu Jan 11 2018 - 03:56:06 CST)
- Re: Emoji’s Pierpaolo Bernardi via Unicode (Thu Jan 11 2018 - 04:07:23 CST)
- Re: Emoji’s Christoph Päper via Unicode (Thu Jan 11 2018 - 05:30:39 CST)
  - Re: Emoji’s Manish Goregaokar via Unicode (Thu Jan 11 2018 - 22:53:26 CST)
PDF restrictions on the Unicode Standard 10.0 Henri Sivonen via Unicode (Sat Jan 13 2018 - 11:14:13 CST)
0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Eric Muller via Unicode (Mon Jan 15 2018 - 21:25:01 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? James Kass via Unicode (Mon Jan 15 2018 - 22:16:21 CST)
  - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Pravin Jain via Unicode (Mon Jan 15 2018 - 23:55:32 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? James Kass via Unicode (Tue Jan 16 2018 - 01:40:15 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Shriramana Sharma via Unicode (Tue Jan 16 2018 - 02:10:19 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Philippe Verdy via Unicode (Wed Jan 17 2018 - 07:06:26 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Richard Wordingham via Unicode (Tue Jan 16 2018 - 02:46:19 CST)
  - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Richard Wordingham via Unicode (Tue Jan 16 2018 - 02:00:19 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Andre Schappo via Unicode (Thu Jan 18 2018 - 02:21:27 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Andre Schappo via Unicode (Thu Jan 18 2018 - 05:00:35 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Asmus Freytag via Unicode (Thu Jan 18 2018 - 12:51:39 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Shriramana Sharma via Unicode (Fri Jan 19 2018 - 03:16:25 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Andrew West via Unicode (Fri Jan 19 2018 - 03:39:11 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Michael Everson via Unicode (Fri Jan 19 2018 - 07:19:53 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Shriramana Sharma via Unicode (Fri Jan 19 2018 - 07:35:23 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Andrew West via Unicode (Fri Jan 19 2018 - 07:51:43 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Michael Everson via Unicode (Fri Jan 19 2018 - 08:23:29 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Rick McGowan via Unicode (Fri Jan 19 2018 - 10:42:07 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Philippe Verdy via Unicode (Fri Jan 19 2018 - 07:37:40 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Philippe Verdy via Unicode (Fri Jan 19 2018 - 07:42:52 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Michael Everson via Unicode (Fri Jan 19 2018 - 07:47:43 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Philippe Verdy via Unicode (Fri Jan 19 2018 - 07:56:48 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Asmus Freytag \(c\) via Unicode (Fri Jan 19 2018 - 14:10:33 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Philippe Verdy via Unicode (Fri Jan 19 2018 - 18:41:54 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? James Kass via Unicode (Fri Jan 19 2018 - 20:59:53 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Shriramana Sharma via Unicode (Fri Jan 19 2018 - 22:24:04 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? James Kass via Unicode (Sat Jan 20 2018 - 00:45:18 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Philippe Verdy via Unicode (Fri Jan 19 2018 - 07:51:35 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Asmus Freytag \(c\) via Unicode (Fri Jan 19 2018 - 14:08:23 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Simon Montagu via Unicode (Sat Jan 20 2018 - 14:04:49 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Philippe Verdy via Unicode (Sun Jan 21 2018 - 06:49:46 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Richard Wordingham via Unicode (Sun Jan 21 2018 - 12:49:45 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Phake Nick via Unicode (Sun Jan 21 2018 - 21:35:16 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Richard Wordingham via Unicode (Mon Jan 22 2018 - 17:26:38 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? James Kass via Unicode (Mon Jan 22 2018 - 18:55:45 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Martin J. Dürst via Unicode (Mon Jan 22 2018 - 19:52:05 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? James Kass via Unicode (Mon Jan 22 2018 - 22:31:57 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? James Kass via Unicode (Tue Jan 23 2018 - 00:45:29 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Christoph Päper via Unicode (Tue Jan 23 2018 - 09:18:11 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Philippe Verdy via Unicode (Tue Jan 23 2018 - 11:58:12 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Shriramana Sharma via Unicode (Wed Jan 24 2018 - 20:29:08 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? David Starner via Unicode (Wed Jan 24 2018 - 20:49:24 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Philippe Verdy via Unicode (Wed Jan 24 2018 - 21:30:52 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Andrew West via Unicode (Thu Jan 25 2018 - 06:15:18 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Philippe Verdy via Unicode (Thu Jan 25 2018 - 09:40:44 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Philippe Verdy via Unicode (Thu Jan 25 2018 - 09:48:42 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode (Thu Jan 25 2018 - 12:48:59 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Andre Schappo via Unicode (Fri Jan 26 2018 - 02:25:10 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Shriramana Sharma via Unicode (Fri Jan 26 2018 - 02:49:55 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Andre Schappo via Unicode (Fri Jan 26 2018 - 03:08:51 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Richard Wordingham via Unicode (Fri Jan 26 2018 - 10:47:49 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? John W Kennedy via Unicode (Fri Jan 26 2018 - 15:14:22 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Julian Bradfield via Unicode (Sat Jan 27 2018 - 03:29:03 CST)
    - In the mean time, in France (was Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) Denis Jacquerye via Unicode (Sat Jan 27 2018 - 04:22:22 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Andre Schappo via Unicode (Thu Jan 18 2018 - 09:38:06 CST)
  - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Christoph Päper via Unicode (Wed Jan 17 2018 - 16:11:09 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Doug Ewell via Unicode (Tue Jan 23 2018 - 12:51:42 CST)
  - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? James Kass via Unicode (Tue Jan 23 2018 - 13:33:49 CST)
  - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? David Starner via Unicode (Tue Jan 23 2018 - 13:35:51 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Philippe Verdy via Unicode (Tue Jan 23 2018 - 14:53:25 CST)
  - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Richard Wordingham via Unicode (Tue Jan 23 2018 - 19:28:54 CST)
  - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Shriramana Sharma via Unicode (Wed Jan 24 2018 - 20:29:11 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Mark E. Shoulson via Unicode (Wed Jan 24 2018 - 21:27:34 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Philippe Verdy via Unicode (Wed Jan 24 2018 - 21:41:02 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Richard Wordingham via Unicode (Thu Jan 25 2018 - 00:51:33 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Phake Nick via Unicode (Tue Jan 23 2018 - 13:22:37 CST)
  - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Richard Wordingham via Unicode (Tue Jan 23 2018 - 15:52:46 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Marcel Schneider via Unicode (Sat Jan 27 2018 - 15:54:57 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Richard Wordingham via Unicode (Sat Jan 27 2018 - 23:02:47 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Marcel Schneider via Unicode (Sun Jan 28 2018 - 01:12:45 CST)
- RE: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Doug Ewell via Unicode (Tue Jan 23 2018 - 16:24:05 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? philip chastney via Unicode (Wed Jan 24 2018 - 03:45:03 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Doug Ewell via Unicode (Wed Jan 24 2018 - 16:19:07 CST)
  - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Philippe Verdy via Unicode (Wed Jan 24 2018 - 17:55:34 CST)
    - Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Doug Ewell via Unicode (Thu Jan 25 2018 - 08:14:46 CST)
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Doug Ewell via Unicode (Thu Jan 25 2018 - 13:34:16 CST)
Observations and rants Mark E. Shoulson via Unicode (Wed Jan 17 2018 - 20:30:57 CST)
Emoji for major planets at least? Shriramana Sharma via Unicode (Thu Jan 18 2018 - 08:55:52 CST)
- Re: Emoji for major planets at least? Asmus Freytag via Unicode (Thu Jan 18 2018 - 11:44:05 CST)
  - Re: Emoji for major planets at least? John H. Jenkins via Unicode (Thu Jan 18 2018 - 12:01:43 CST)
    - Re: Emoji for major planets at least? Asmus Freytag \(c\) via Unicode (Thu Jan 18 2018 - 12:46:24 CST)
    - Re: Emoji for major planets at least? Anshuman Pandey via Unicode (Thu Jan 18 2018 - 13:04:09 CST)
    - Re: Emoji for major planets at least? Philippe Verdy via Unicode (Thu Jan 18 2018 - 15:10:46 CST)
    - Re: Emoji for major planets at least? Walter Tross via Unicode (Thu Jan 18 2018 - 15:59:12 CST)
    - Re: Emoji for major planets at least? Asmus Freytag via Unicode (Thu Jan 18 2018 - 17:25:02 CST)
    - Re: Emoji for major planets at least? Aleksey Tulinov via Unicode (Thu Jan 18 2018 - 18:19:14 CST)
    - Re: Emoji for major planets at least? Pierpaolo Bernardi via Unicode (Thu Jan 18 2018 - 19:12:04 CST)
    - Re: Emoji for major planets at least? Richard Wordingham via Unicode (Fri Jan 19 2018 - 02:42:44 CST)
    - Re: Emoji for major planets at least? Christoph Päper via Unicode (Fri Jan 19 2018 - 08:16:05 CST)
superscripts & subscripts for science/mathematics? David Melik via Unicode (Sun Jan 21 2018 - 00:14:15 CST)
- Re: superscripts & subscripts for science/mathematics? philip chastney via Unicode (Tue Jan 23 2018 - 08:23:54 CST)
superscripts & subscripts for science/mathematics? David Melik via Unicode (Sun Jan 21 2018 - 00:15:35 CST)
- Re: superscripts & subscripts for science/mathematics? David Melik via Unicode (Mon Jan 22 2018 - 21:43:34 CST)
  - Re: superscripts & subscripts for science/mathematics? Khaled Hosny via Unicode (Tue Jan 23 2018 - 05:51:17 CST)
Re: Proposed Expansion of Grapheme Clusters to Whole Aksharas - Implementation Issues Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode (Mon Jan 22 2018 - 00:34:12 CST)
- Re: Proposed Expansion of Grapheme Clusters to Whole Aksharas - Implementation Issues Richard Wordingham via Unicode (Mon Jan 22 2018 - 20:34:29 CST)
- Re: Proposed Expansion of Grapheme Clusters to Whole Aksharas - Implementation Issues Richard Wordingham via Unicode (Mon Jan 22 2018 - 20:41:00 CST)
  - Re: Proposed Expansion of Grapheme Clusters to Whole Aksharas - Implementation Issues Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode (Mon Jan 22 2018 - 21:34:38 CST)
- Re: Proposed Expansion of Grapheme Clusters to Whole Aksharas - Implementation Issues Richard Wordingham via Unicode (Mon Jan 22 2018 - 21:06:04 CST)
SignWriting in U+40000 block Doug Ewell via Unicode (Mon Jan 22 2018 - 10:28:58 CST)
Internationalised Computer Science Exercises Andre Schappo via Unicode (Mon Jan 22 2018 - 10:39:57 CST)
- Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises Frédéric Grosshans via Unicode (Mon Jan 22 2018 - 11:55:16 CST)
  - Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises Richard Wordingham via Unicode (Mon Jan 22 2018 - 17:02:42 CST)
- Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises Richard Wordingham via Unicode (Mon Jan 22 2018 - 16:08:55 CST)
  - Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises Shervin Afshar via Unicode (Sat Jan 27 2018 - 16:13:40 CST)
    - Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises Richard Wordingham via Unicode (Sat Jan 27 2018 - 22:12:30 CST)
    - Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises Philippe Verdy via Unicode (Sun Jan 28 2018 - 13:29:28 CST)
    - Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises Philippe Verdy via Unicode (Sun Jan 28 2018 - 13:30:44 CST)
    - Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises Philippe Verdy via Unicode (Sun Jan 28 2018 - 13:45:36 CST)
    - Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises Richard Wordingham via Unicode (Sun Jan 28 2018 - 16:44:56 CST)
    - Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises Philippe Verdy via Unicode (Mon Jan 29 2018 - 00:16:04 CST)
    - Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises Philippe Verdy via Unicode (Mon Jan 29 2018 - 00:37:46 CST)
    - Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises Philippe Verdy via Unicode (Mon Jan 29 2018 - 01:54:29 CST)
    - Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises Richard Wordingham via Unicode (Mon Jan 29 2018 - 02:57:41 CST)
    - Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises Philippe Verdy via Unicode (Mon Jan 29 2018 - 07:15:04 CST)
    - Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises Richard Wordingham via Unicode (Mon Jan 29 2018 - 14:53:05 CST)
    - Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises Philippe Verdy via Unicode (Wed Jan 31 2018 - 12:45:56 CST)
    - Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises Richard Wordingham via Unicode (Wed Jan 31 2018 - 19:38:58 CST)
    - Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises Andre Schappo via Unicode (Mon Jan 29 2018 - 07:03:38 CST)
Internationalization & Unicode Conference 2018 Andre Schappo via Unicode (Wed Jan 24 2018 - 07:27:04 CST)
- Re: Internationalization & Unicode Conference 2018 Markus Scherer via Unicode (Wed Jan 24 2018 - 10:11:25 CST)
[HUMOR] Proof that emojis are useful Stephane Bortzmeyer via Unicode (Sat Jan 27 2018 - 09:31:56 CST)
- Re: [HUMOR] Proof that emojis are useful Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode (Sat Jan 27 2018 - 11:45:30 CST)
TIRONIAN SIGN ET Janusz S. Bień via Unicode (Sat Jan 27 2018 - 13:40:49 CST)
- Re: TIRONIAN SIGN ET Rick McGowan via Unicode (Sat Jan 27 2018 - 13:53:08 CST)
  - Re: TIRONIAN SIGN ET Janusz S. Bień via Unicode (Sat Jan 27 2018 - 14:17:18 CST)
- Re: TIRONIAN SIGN ET Janusz S. Bień via Unicode (Sun Jan 28 2018 - 01:23:15 CST)
Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) Doug Ewell via Unicode (Sun Jan 28 2018 - 15:11:06 CST)
- Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode (Sun Jan 28 2018 - 17:04:37 CST)
  - Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) Doug Ewell via Unicode (Sun Jan 28 2018 - 17:20:16 CST)
    - Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR Marcel Schneider via Unicode (Sun Jan 28 2018 - 20:17:34 CST)
    - Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR Doug Ewell via Unicode (Tue Jan 30 2018 - 12:34:40 CST)
    - Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR Marcel Schneider via Unicode (Tue Jan 30 2018 - 13:42:02 CST)
    - Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode (Sun Jan 28 2018 - 23:56:25 CST)
    - Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) Marcel Schneider via Unicode (Mon Jan 29 2018 - 05:26:01 CST)
    - Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR Marcel Schneider via Unicode (Mon Jan 29 2018 - 06:38:48 CST)
    - Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) Tom Gewecke via Unicode (Mon Jan 29 2018 - 12:13:21 CST)
    - Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) Marcel Schneider via Unicode (Mon Jan 29 2018 - 23:31:34 CST)
    - Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) Philippe Verdy via Unicode (Tue Jan 30 2018 - 01:18:49 CST)
    - Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR Martin J. Dürst via Unicode (Tue Jan 30 2018 - 02:06:52 CST)
    - Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR Eric Muller via Unicode (Tue Jan 30 2018 - 07:15:16 CST)
    - Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR Marcel Schneider via Unicode (Tue Jan 30 2018 - 15:24:23 CST)
    - Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR Philippe Verdy via Unicode (Wed Jan 31 2018 - 12:05:17 CST)
    - Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR Marcel Schneider via Unicode (Wed Jan 31 2018 - 16:44:05 CST)
    - Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR Philippe Verdy via Unicode (Wed Jan 31 2018 - 17:30:45 CST)
    - Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) Alastair Houghton via Unicode (Tue Jan 30 2018 - 04:20:46 CST)
    - Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) Tom Gewecke via Unicode (Tue Jan 30 2018 - 09:54:19 CST)
    - Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR Marcel Schneider via Unicode (Tue Jan 30 2018 - 11:55:46 CST)
    - Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR Marcel Schneider via Unicode (Tue Jan 30 2018 - 13:09:31 CST)
    - Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) David Starner via Unicode (Tue Jan 30 2018 - 17:30:59 CST)
- Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) Marcel Schneider via Unicode (Sun Jan 28 2018 - 21:55:22 CST)
- RE: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) Doug Ewell via Unicode (Mon Jan 29 2018 - 17:07:11 CST)
- RE: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) Doug Ewell via Unicode (Mon Jan 29 2018 - 20:08:55 CST)
- RE: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) Marcel Schneider via Unicode (Mon Jan 29 2018 - 23:09:10 CST)
  - Support for Extension F via Unicode (Mon Jan 29 2018 - 23:26:54 CST)
    - Re: Support for Extension F John H. Jenkins via Unicode (Wed Jan 31 2018 - 11:25:22 CST)
    - Re: Support for Extension F Tom Gewecke via Unicode (Wed Jan 31 2018 - 11:51:04 CST)
    - Re: Support for Extension F Paul Hackett via Unicode (Wed Jan 31 2018 - 12:26:51 CST)
- Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) Marcel Schneider via Unicode (Tue Jan 30 2018 - 22:39:00 CST)
- Re: Keyboard layouts and CLDR (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) Philippe Verdy via Unicode (Wed Jan 31 2018 - 13:26:42 CST)
RE: Keyboard layouts and CLDR Doug Ewell via Unicode (Tue Jan 30 2018 - 12:50:49 CST)
- RE: Keyboard layouts and CLDR Marcel Schneider via Unicode (Tue Jan 30 2018 - 14:06:06 CST)
IUC 42 Call for Participation Announced! announcements_at_unicode.org (Wed Jan 31 2018 - 17:05:57 CST)
CLDR Keyboard and Layout discussion Sarasvati via Unicode (Wed Jan 31 2018 - 17:50:51 CST)

Unicode Mail List Archive by thread