Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?

From: Andrew West via Unicode <unicode_at_unicode.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 12:15:18 +0000

On 23 January 2018 at 00:55, James Kass via Unicode <unicode_at_unicode.org> wrote:
>
> Regular American users simply don't type umlauts, period.

Not even the president of the Unicode Consortium when referring to
Christoph Päper:

http://www.unicode.org/L2/L2018/18051-emoji-ad-hoc-resp.pdf

Andrew
Received on Thu Jan 25 2018 - 06:16:09 CST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Doug Ewell via Unicode: "Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?"
Previous message: Richard Wordingham via Unicode: "Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?"
In reply to: James Kass via Unicode: "Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?"
Next in thread: Philippe Verdy via Unicode: "Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?"
Reply: Philippe Verdy via Unicode: "Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?"
Reply: Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode: "Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Jan 25 2018 - 06:16:10 CST