0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?

From: Eric Muller via Unicode <unicode_at_unicode.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 19:25:01 -0800

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/15/world/asia/kazakhstan-alphabet-nursultan-nazarbayev.html

Eric.
Received on Mon Jan 15 2018 - 21:25:35 CST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Doug Ewell via Unicode: "Re: Non-RGI sequences are not emoji? (was: Re: Unifying E_Modifier and Extend in UAX 29 (i.e. the necessity of GB10))"
Previous message: Henri Sivonen via Unicode: "PDF restrictions on the Unicode Standard 10.0"
Next in thread: James Kass via Unicode: "Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?"
Reply: James Kass via Unicode: "Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?"
Maybe reply: Doug Ewell via Unicode: "Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?"
Maybe reply: Phake Nick via Unicode: "Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?"
Maybe reply: Doug Ewell via Unicode: "RE: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?"
Maybe reply: philip chastney via Unicode: "Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?"
Maybe reply: Doug Ewell via Unicode: "Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?"
Maybe reply: Doug Ewell via Unicode: "Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jan 15 2018 - 21:25:37 CST